untitled
viviti
Soldier - Vignettes

notice - this is a private page intended for personal and academic use only (I am an adjunct professor with an online university) - any copyrighted material on any of these pages is used in "fair use," for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis only, and will be removed at the request of copyright owner(s). No material benefit or profit is sought or gained. Titles are links to sites or documents.

----------------------
Ben Beall at West Point: Dropped from the Rolls
The Beall Chronicles: An account of a Dragoon officer to be
By George Stammerjohan and Will Gorenfeld
While stationed out on the western plains, Major Benjamin Beall recounted to Lt. Orlando Wilcox how, in the year 1814, he arrived at the Military Academy, a brash youth, fully "equipped with a pointer and a liquor flask." Beall described his new cadet uniform as consisting of an "embroidered coat, tights, high top boots with tassels, cocked hat & sword" and mentioned how he almost got into a fist-fight in New York with a street urchin who had taunted him by "singing out 'there goes a middy on half pay." He described his new cadet uniform as consisting of an "embroidered coat, tights, high top boots with tassels, cocked hat & sword" and he almost got into a fist fight in New York with a street urchin who had taunted him by "singing out 'there goes a middy on half pay." 1
Benjamin Lloyd Beall was born at Ft. Adams in Rhode Island late in the year of 1800. Lloyd Beall, his father, was a career officer who had served during the Revolutionary War and, in 1814, was a Major of Artillery. On March 25, 1814, Ben Beall, aged thirteen years and five months, was admitted to West Point. His application papers mention that he was a resident of Virginia and that Lloyd Beall, of Harpers Ferry, Virginia, was his legal guardian.
At that time of Beall's admission, the Military Academy did not have a systematic four year course of study for its cadets. This would all change in 1817 when Sylvanus Thayer became Superintendent of West Point. The energetic Superintendent Thayer was intent upon turning the Academy into a first class institution of higher instruction. He administered tests to the cadets in attendance and assigned them to classes based upon their test results.
Suffice it to say that by June of 1818, Badet Beall was ranked sixteenth in a class of nineteen cadets in his section. Academy records for 1818 indicate that Beall, despite having already having spent four years at the Military Academy was destined to be placed in the third (sophmore) class that fall. Worse, the record contained the ominous notation that Cadet Beall was "subject to be put back . . . [but] allowed to proceed until further notice." It is altogether likely that young Cadet Beall was disheartened by his low academic standing but, it was the death of his father in 1817 that caused him to absent himself without leave from the Military Academy. On October 16, 1818, the post adjutant ordered that due to his absence without leave, Cadet Beall be discharged from the Institution and his name . . . dropped from the rolls accordingly."
This was, however, not to be the end of the military career of Benjamin Lloyd Beall. In 1818, with the aid of some influential friends of his late father, Beall secured a clerkship with the War Department. He would there for the next 18 years. Responding to the need for effective troops to fight the Seminoles, Congress, in May of 1836, voted to appropriate funds with which to raise a second regiment of Dragoons. On 1836, Benjamin Beall gained a captain's commission in the 2d Dragoons.
Notes 1. Orlando Wilcox: Forgotten Valor, ed Robert Scott (Kansas State University Press 1999), 137.
source - http://www.musketoon.com/2005/01/ben-beall-at-west-point-dropped-from.html

----------------------
THE ONE-ARMED DEVIL GENERAL PHILIP KEARNY Introduction There is fine line between bravery and foolishness, one that Civil War hero General Philip Kearny consistently straddled during his career. His heroics have made him the stuff of legends, but he was flesh and blood, and subject to the same temptations, weaknesses and fears as the rest of us. His record on the field of battle was unblemished, but off the field was another story entirely. Here now is the true story of New Jersey's most famous fighter, General Philip Kearny. Kearny le Magnifique If Phil Kearny's father and grandfather hoped to extinguish his yearning for the military, they were unsuccessful. And on September 3, 1836, grandfather John Watts made a fatal error. He died at the age of 87. In his will he made the 22 year old Kearny a millionaire in his own right. He was now a legal adult with no financial worries and his father's control over his life was a thing of the past. So when junior Kearny announced he was joining the army, there was nothing the senior Kearny could do. Kearny called on the assistance of his uncle, Lieutenant Colonel Stephen Watts Kearny, as well as the even more prestigious General Winfield Scott, who he had met and impressed while in school. The newly commissioned second lieutenant reported to his uncle at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, on June 10, 1837, and served with the First Dragoons for the next two years protecting settlers and pioneers traveling west. Kearny was a popular, if eccentric officer. He was, of course, a fine horseman, and was quick to praise and reward those under his command. His fellow soldiers could never understand why someone of his wealth and background would volunteer for the rigors of army life, but they enjoyed the benefits of serving with him, as he often used his tremendous wealth to ensure his unit was the best outfitted and supplied one in the United States Army. After a few years in the field he was assigned as an aide-de-camp to the military district commandant, Brigadier-General Henry Atkinson. Kearny may not have been too happy about his new assignment, but it did have one important benefit; the commandant's beautiful sister-in-law, Diana Bullitt. There was an instant attraction between Diana and Phil, and soon the two were inseparable. The assumption by most was that a marriage would soon occur. Kearny, however, had other plans. To the shock of everyone (including Diana) he accepted an assignment overseas. At that time France was considered to have the finest cavalry in the world. The United States government decided to send three young officers there to study cavalry tactics the French forces. Kearny was one of those chosen, perhaps due to the fact that his uncle Stephen made the selections. He arrived in France in 1839, just in time to join the Duke of Orleans Expeditionary Force to Algiers. At last Kearny had the chance he had been waiting for; the chance to actually go to war and fight. With the permission of the Secretary of War, Kearny traveled to North Africa where, of course, he performed brilliantly, earning the nickname 'Kearny le Magnifique.' He was offered the French Legion of Honor, but he was forced to decline the award because he was an officer of the United States Army. In 1840 he took what lessons and tactics he had learned home with him (along with many honors and gifts) to resume his military career...It was at Churubusco that the legend of Philip Kearny began. On August 20, 1847, General Scott confronted the enemy at this heavily fortified village, a suburb of Mexico City. Kearny and his men were finally allowed to fight. Leading about 100 cavalrymen across a causeway he slammed into the retreating enemy at the very gates of the city. Although vastly outnumbered, Kearny and his men fought valiantly. He charged into the thick of the Mexican forces swinging his saber like a madman. A bugle sounded retreat and many of his men gave way, but Kearny and a few dozen continued the fight. Finally they were overwhelmed and Kearny raced back over the causeway on foot and quickly mounted a rider less horse. The enemy fired at the now retreating cavalry, and one bullet found its mark on Kearny. His left arm was badly wounded and later that day, as Brigadier General Franklin Pierce (later President) held him down, his arm was amputated. "I forsaw this," Kearny told him. Kearny received his brevet at a terrible cost, and was granted a battlefield promotion to Major... What Am I If No Longer American Major Philip Kearny spent the next six months at home in New York, but he did take the honorable discharge the army offered. He was given a hero's welcome and for the next three years served as recruiting chief in the city. This time, however, his wife Diana did not so easily forgive what she considered desertion on his part. As Kearny rehabbed and learned to function with only one arm, their troubles escalated. Not even the birth of another daughter could stop the constant bickering between them. Finally almost exactly two years to the day of his wounding in Mexico, she left New York. Although it was thought at the time to be temporary, they never again lived together. After only eight years of marriage, she had had enough. If the loss of his wife affected Kearny he did not show it. He continued his recruiting duties and rehabilitation, and eventually was able to overcome his disability, even riding a horse with his old abandon holding the reins in his mouth while he used his right hand to hold his sword. His dissatisfaction with the army continued unabated. He complained that he was never rewarded properly for his heroism in Mexico, and now he felt shunted aside unable to get back in the field. Finally in July, 1851, Kearny received orders to rejoin his old command in California, just in time to confront the Rouge River tribe that had gone on a rampage attacking farms and settlers. Kearny marched his men to Oregon and routed the warriors ending hostilities. If Kearny expected to be rewarded with another promotion for his labors he was sadly mistaken. By now the army was fed up with him and his temperament. Never an easy man to deal with, he had become increasingly hostile and ambivalent to his superiors, openly questioning their judgment and qualifications. It may not have helped matters that his estranged wife was the sister-in-law of the respected, late General Henry Atkinson. Not even his mentor and friend, General Winfield Scott could assist him with his ambitions. Finally, Kearny admitted defeat and resigned his commission in October, 1851. It was promptly accepted. "I had hoped for at least a token murmur of demurral," he later wrote. Kearny's military career may have been over, but he was still young (36) and rich. He immediately began a world tour which eventually culminated in his beloved Paris, where he had so enjoyed himself a decade earlier. His heroic reputation there, first formed from his adventures in Algiers, had only increased with the news of his courage in Mexico and Oregon. It was there he came upon a young twenty year old engaged woman by the name of Agnes Maxwell. She was visiting Paris from her home in New York City. Kearny forgot about his wife and four children, and Agnes forgot about her husband-to-be, and they began openly living together in Paris. His legal and embarrassed wife, Diana, angrily refused a divorce when he visited her in 1854 to request one. By 1855, Agnes and Kearny had left New York to settle in his new mansion, Bellegrove, overlooking the Passaic River in what is now Kearny, New Jersey. They had come here to escape the disapproving tongues of New York society. Bellegrove was located only a short distance and across the river from his family's old manor in Newark. In 1858, Diana finally acceded to his demands for a divorce, but so angry was she at her young replacement, she stipulated in the divorce decree that he could never marry again as long as she lived. As soon as the divorce was granted, Kearny began to look for a way around Diana's unusual stipulation. He found it when his lawyers argued that it was only valid in New York State, and Kearny was free to marry Agnes in New Jersey where they now lived. However, New York did not agree with this interpretation, and for a time Kearny would avoid his native city for fear of arrest on the charge of bigamy. Of course the quiet life of a country squire did not suite Kearny for long. In 1859 he traveled to France again and volunteered for the campaign against Austria that year. He fought with tremendous courage and distinction and when again offered the Legion of Honor, he accepted becoming the first American so honored. He stayed in Paris until 1861, when the outbreak of the Civil War back home spurred him to action. He was recruited by the South to join their cause and lend his support as an officer when the war erupted. Although he may have sympathized with many of the South's concerns, and was friendly with many of their military leaders, he told them, "What am I, if no longer American." Kearny returned home to offer his service to the Union. It Is a Sweet and Pleasing Thing to Die For Ones Country Philip Kearny arrived in Washington ready to serve in whatever capacity the government needed. Since so many seasoned military leaders had joined with the Southern cause, the Union was desperate for skilled leadership. Yet amazingly, Kearny was ignored. His reputation for difficulty seemed to overshadow his reputation for courage and leadership. Also, the Agnes Maxwell scandal outraged many in the War Department. When he realized he was not going to be granted a commission in the army he tried to join as a lowly private, but was again rejected because of his infirmity. Kearny headed home to Bellegrove angry and disappointed. His disappointment would not last. In July, 1861, New Jersey recognized the War Department's folly and commissioned him as a Brigadier General, and placed him in command of the New Jersey Brigade stationed near Alexandria, Virginia. He found his new brigade barely trained and undisciplined. He immediately began to change that with constant drills and marches while awaiting the seemingly never to be fought battles. He was tough, but he was fair, and he always looked out for his men, making sure they were properly fed and outfitted even at his own personal expense. He urged General George McClellan, head of the Union forces to attack Richmond, the Southern capital, and possibly end the war quickly, but McClellan held the army back. The longer McClellan hesitated, the more frustrated Kearny became, finally culminating in series of published letters criticizing the commander. The army was again outraged. But what made the army hate Kearny, made his men love him. They too were clamoring for battle.In late August the army began to push towards Manassas, Virginia, for the disastrous second battle of Bull Run under the command of General John Pope. On August 29, Kearny led his division on a desperate charge at the Confederate left at Groveton. He almost won, but was forced back by superior forces. The following day, Stonewall Jackson battered the Union lines on all fronts and as night fell only a few troops fought on. Kearny's men were one of those few. As even they finally retreated he was heard shouting, "Are there only imbeciles to lead us?" The South continued the pressure the following day as a terrific rain storm raged. As night approached the Confederate troops tried to flank the Union army at Chantilly. Kearny, who often acted as his own scout, rode out to survey the area ahead. He galloped straight into a Southern outpost. The order was given to halt and surrender, but Kearny had escaped from more difficult situations. Rearing his horse he galloped away as the soldiers fired after him. Witnesses remembered him shouting, "They can't hit a barn!" A single bullet proved him wrong. It entered the base of his spine and ended his life....Years earlier in New York, when he was presented a sword in honor of his charge in the Mexican War, Kearny said, "I must ever so strongly bear in mind that in a Republic particularly applies the motto, "It is a sweet and pleasing thing to die for ones country." He died as he would have wanted, a hero recklessly fighting for his nation. The man had become a legend. Epilogue While there was no truth to the rumor that Philip Kearny's son by Diana, John Watts Kearny, had tried to join the Confederate Army so he could shoot at his father, there was no love lost between them. The son sided with the mother during the divorce and rarely, if ever, spoke to his father after it. Despite this, upon Philip's death, it is said he received the largest inheritance in the history of the United States to that date. Eventually he settled in Bellegrove, and the estate stayed in the family's hands until it was torn down in 1926 to make room for a real estate development. A statue of Philip Kearny, which originally stood at the State House in Trenton, was dedicated at Military Park in Newark in 1880. The ceremony was attended by Ulysses S. Grant, William T. Sherman and the then Governor George McClellan. But even Kearny's statue caused controversy. In 1925 it was moved to another part of the park to make room for the "Wars of America" monument. In 1961, the statue was reset on the pedestal facing west, its back to the Passaic River and the town of Kearny that was his home and was named in his honor. The argument between Newark and Kearny continued on and off for over 30 years. Finally in the 1990's the statue was taken down for restoration and in a compromise, an exact copy was made for the Township of Kearny which was unveiled in 1994 in front of the Kearny Post Office. Some of the bricks recovered from Bellegrove were used in the base of the statue. In a famous Hollywood movie there is a line, "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." So has the true life of General Philip Kearny been forgotten. There have been numerous biographies of him, but most gloss over his fallacies in both war and peace. Some never even mention his second marriage and the scandal it created, or Kearny's sometimes pompous and ingratiating attitude. As John T. Cunningham wrote, "Each [biographies of Kearny] in his own way failed to clarify a life. Rather, both drew tighter the web of legend." When Kearny died he took much of the truth with him. Although there are many statues and plaques honoring him, and even a town in New Jersey named for him, little remains to tell his true story. "This life can be told straight - and it must soon be told, lest Phil Kearny escape forever into mythology," wrote Cunningham, "Phil Kearny, you see, was not really a legend." - New Jersey History's Mysterys http://www.njhm.com/kearny.htm -----------------------

"There were sixty-two graduating members of the class of 1842, my number being sixty. I was assigned to the Fourth United States Infantry as brevet lieutenant, and found my company with seven others of the regiment at Jefferson Barracks, Missouri, in the autumn of 1842.
Of the class graduating the year that we entered were G. T. Beauregard and Irvin McDowell, who, twenty-three years later, commanded the hostile armies on the plains of Manassas, in Virginia. Braxton Bragg and W. J. Hardee were of the same class.The head man of the next class (1839) was I. I. Stevens, who resigned from the army, and, after being the first governor of Washington Territory, returned to military service, and fell on the sanguinary field of Chantilly on the 1st of September, 1862. Next on the class roll was Henry Wager Halleck, who was commander-in-chief of the United States armies from July, 1862, to March, 1864. W.T. Sherman and George H. Thomas, of the Union army, and R. S. Ewell, of the Confederate army, were of the same class (1840). The class of 1841 had the largest list of officers killed in action. Irons, Ayers, Ernst, Gantt, Morris, and Burbank were killed in the Mexican War. N. Lyon, R. S. Garnett, J. F. Reynolds, R. B. Garnett, A. W. Whipple, J. M. Jones, I. B. Richardson, and J. P. Garesché fell on the fields of the late war. Of the class of 1842 few were killed in action, but several rose to distinguished positions,--Newton, Eustis, Rosecrans, Lovell, Van Dorn, Pope, Sykes, G. W. Smith, M. L. Smith, R. H. Anderson, L. McLaws, D. H. Hill, A. P. Stewart, B. S. Alexander, N. J. T. Dana, and others.
But the class next after us (1843) was destined to furnish the man who was to eclipse all,--to rise to the rank of general, an office made by Congress to honor his services; who became President of the United States, and for a second term; who received the salutations of all the powers of the world in his travels as a private citizen around the earth; of noble, generous heart, a lovable character, a valued friend,--Ulysses S. Grant....
...Of the class of 1843, Ulysses S. Grant joined the Fourth Regiment as brevet lieutenant, and I had the pleasure to ride with him on our first visit to Mr. Frederick Dent's home, a few miles from the garrison, where we first met Miss Julia Dent, the charming woman who, five years later, became Mrs. Grant. Miss Dent was a frequent visitor at the garrison balls and hops, where Lieutenant Hoskins, who was something of a tease, would inquire of her if she could tell where he might find "the small lieutenant with the large epaulettes." - LongstreetLongstreet was Grant's best man at his wedding and was a distant cousin of Julia Dent Grant


Grant versus Grant



Grant

-----------------------
Frederick T. Dent (1820-1892)
4th, 5th and 9th Infantry Regiments
WIA - BATTLE OF EL MOLINO DEL REY, MEXICO SEPTEMBER 8, 1847
In August, 1858, an expedition was organized under command of Colonel Wright to proceed against the Spokane Indians and their allies. Companies B and C (Commanded by Captain Dent) formed port of this expedition, and after two engagements at Four Lakes and on Spokane Plains, W. T., it was successful in bringing about a lasting peace with the Indians of that section.
Grant's chief Aide-de-Camp and military secretary (and also brother-in-law)
Major Frederick T. Dent, Fourth U. S. Infantry, brigadier-general of volunteers, formerly lieutenant-colonel and aide-de-camp and brevet colonel of volunteers, to be lieutenant-colonel by brevet for gallant conduct in the battle of the Wilderness to date from May 6, 1864; to be colonel by brevet for gallant conduct in the battles in front of Petersburg and in the pursuit and capture of the Army of Northern Virginia, in the spring campaign of 1865, to date from April 9, 1865. - recommended by US Grant, June 6, 1865.
Brigadier-general by brevet, Breveted Colonel, major of the Fourth Regiment United States Infantry, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war, to date from March 13, 1865


On his graduation in 1843, cadet Grant was assigned a position as brevet second lieutenant of the fourth regiment, United States Infantry, and joined his regiment in the autumn of that year, at Jefferson Barracks, near St. Louis, Missouri. He had a classmate, Frederick T. Dent, who was from St. Louis, and who had been assigned like himself to the fourth infantry. The two were warm friends, and Lieutenant Dent (now Brigadier-General Dent, on Gen. Sherman's staff) took his classmate to his own home, whenever they could obtain leave. Here he formed the acquaintance of the estimable lady, then Miss Maria Dent, whom five years subsequently be married.
MASSACRE OF EMIGRANTS AT SALMON FALLS
CAPTAIN DENT SENT TO THE RESCUE OF THE SURIVIVORS
OFFICIAL REPORT OF CAPTAIN DENT
HISTORY OF PACIFIC NORTHWEST - OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

Captain Frederick T. Dent, a brother-in-law of Ulysses S. Grant, commanded the expedition that carried relief to and rescued the survivors. His official report bears date November 8, 1860. He received orders at Fort Dalles, October 4, 1860, to take command of the expedition, to recover or rescue any survivors there might be of the massacre of emigrants which took place on the 9th and 10th of September, 1860, in the vicinity of Salmon Falls, on Snake river. The command, consisting of sixty dragoons and forty infantry, with four company officers, march on the fifth. The report, which is of great interest proceeds:
"The infantry were mounted on mules; and our stores, ammunition and camp equipage were transported on pack-mules. Our march was slow, the command moving together until we reached Powder river, on the 17th of October. Not being satisfied with the speed we were making, I determined to scout the country forward with strong parties unencumbered, and accordingly ordered Lieutenant Reno, with forty men, First Dragoons, and two guides, with ten mules lightly packed, to scout thoroughly the Burnt river and its vicinity, the main command following him as fast as it could. On the evening of the nineteenth, Lieutenant Reno discovered, on a small branch of Burnt river, two emigrants almost naked, without fire, and starving. The names of these two, as given me by themselves, are Civilian G. Munson and Charles M. Chaffee.
"Lieutenant Reno clothed them and supplied them with food; and, leaving a corporal and ten men with them, he proceeded rapidly to the front. On arriving at the place on Burnt river where the road leaves it, and having found no trace of the remainder of the emigrants, Lieutenant Reno put in camp twenty-five of his party, and, with five men and Mr. Craigie, the guide, proceeded riding day and night to the Malheur. Having made no discoveries on the Malheur, Lieutenant Reno returned towards Burnt river. At some points on the road he found tracks of women and children, their trail passing over rocky ground; but rain having fallen on it since, it was hard to follow until he came to where the emigrant road between Malheur and Burnt river touches on Snake river. There the trail was fresh; and his hopes were aroused of speedily finding them. The daylight was nearly gone, but the search continued; and, when he had proceeded to within two miles of the camp he had left on Burnt river, he came upon, at a short distance from the road, and in the sagebrush, a scene of murder and mutilation only to be found where the warwhoop had signaled the scalping-knife's deadly work. Gleaming in the moonlight, dead, stripped and mutilated, lay the bodies of six persons. They were identified by Mr. Reith as Mr. Alexis Vanorman, his wife Abigail Vanorman, and son Marcus Vanorman, Charles Otter, Henry Otter and Samuel Gleason. Mrs. Vanorman had been whipped, scalped and otherwise abused by her murderers. The boys, Charles and Henry Otter, were killed with arrows. Mr. Vanorman, Marcus Vanorman and Samuel Gleason had their throats cut, and besides were pierced by numerous arrows. They appeared to have been dead from four to six days. The wolves had not yet molested them. Decomposition was going on, however; and Lieutenant Reno buried them.
"I arrived immediately afterwards at Lieutenant Reno's camp, and found him absent on a scout with a guide and ten men, he having found, in the vicinity of the place where the Vanormans were killed, a trail of Indians with whom he supposed might be some of the Vanorman family; this he supposed from finding a small barefoot track among the moccasin tracks. He followed the trail to where it went into the Salmon river Mountains, first crossing the Snake river at their bases. Having no means of crossing the Snake river, which is here very rapid and deep, he returned to camp and reported to me. I deemed it best not to pursue the trail at that time, as I had learned from Mr. Munson during that day that on Snake river, some fifteen miles beyond Owyhee, he had parted with the Vanormans, Chase, Myers, and some of the Trimble and Otter families. A long time had elapsed since he left them; yet I had hopes of finding some of them alive, as the Vanormans, who had evidently parted from the others, had been so recently killed. I therefore determined to push forward with all haste.
"Lieutenant Anderson, Ninth Infantry, with thirty-five men and light packs, moved forward with orders to make a thorough search of the Malheur and Owyhee, the main command moving on the same route. On the morning of the 25th of October, while en route to the Owyhee from the Malheur, I received an express from Lieutenant Anderson informing me that, the evening before, he had found on the Owyhee twelve emigrants alive and five dead; that those still alive were keeping life in them by eating those who had died. I will not attempt to describe the scene of horror this camp presented, even when I reached it at twelve o'clock that day. Those who were still alive were skeletons with life in them. Their frantic cries for food rang in our ears incessantly. Food was given them every hour in small quantities; but for days the cry was still kept up by the children.
"Those found and relieved by Lieutenant Anderson were: Mr. Joseph Meyers, Mary E. Myers, his wife, and their five children, Isabella, Margaret, Eugene, Harriet and Carrie; Mrs. Elizabeth Chase and her daughter, Mary Chase; and Miss Emeline Trimble.
"The dead in the camp (consumed) were: Mr. Daniel Chase and his two sons, Daniel and Albert; Elizabeth Trimble; and an infant of Mrs. Otter, half sister of Miss Trimble.
"An hour or two before my arrival at Lieutenant Anderson's camp, he found the remains of Christopher Trimble, who had been murdered by the Indians. His body had been much disturbed by the wolves; but sufficient remained to identify it. These remains were found a short distance beyond the Owyhee. This boy, eleven years of age, deserves special mention. He had killed several Indians in the fight. He left the fugitives and went forward to the Malheur, where he obtained of Chaffee some horse flesh, which he took back to the women and children. He then became a prisoner voluntarily with the Indians, in order that he might obtain salmon to take to the camp, and did succeed in so doing and in going with the Indians there. Two weeks had elapsed since his last visit. It must have been at that time that he was killed. Lieutenant Anderson's party buried the remains found in this camp, and also the remains of young Trimble.
"The 26th of October we remained in camp on the Owyhee, constructing litters and panniers for transporting the women and children. In conversation with Mr. Meyers, I learned that, when Vanorman left the Owyhee, his party consisted of ten persons. Besides those mentioned above as killed, there were four children, - Eliza, Minerva, Reuben and Lucinda Vanorman, the eldest being fourteen years of age. We now felt assured that our conjecture was correct, - that they were captives with the Indians whose trail Lieutenant Reno followed to where they crossed Snake river. I determined to follow that trail on my return to the vicinity of Burnt river, and recover them or learn their fate. We also learned that all who had left the wagons were with us on, or had passed, the Owyhee, and that all who remained at the train were dead before the fugitives left. To save the lives of those we had recovered now became our paramount duty. Officers and men gave them the larger portion of the clothing and blankets they had brought for their own use; yet I feared we should lose some of them from cold. The snow was all around us on the hills. I therefore determined to return to Burnt river; and, on Saturday the twenty-seventh, in a heavy storm of rain and sleet, we commenced our march. Four of the children were in narrow hampers, on pack mules, and two with their mothers in a mule litter. One of the women was carried in a hand litter; this I abandoned, and had her placed on a mule with a man on each side to hold her. It was a weary and painful march to them. On the twenty-seventh, we arrived on Burnt river; and, to my regret, I was forced to abandon all idea of a pursuit of the murderers of the Vanorman family, as the snow had fallen heavily in the mountains and obliterated their trail. This being the case, and the snow still falling on us and around us, I determined to push homeward and cross the Blue Mountains before the snow became too deep for marching over those mountains. At Grand Ronde river we met the ambulances sent out from Walla Walla by Major Steen, with an abundance of clothing, blankets, provisions, etc., sent to the emigrants by the officers, ladies, laundresses and men of the post. Captain Kirkham greatly facilitated our arrival by sending forage to feed our wornout animals and wagons to relieve them of their burdens. We arrived at Fort Walla Walla at eleven a.m. on the 7th of November, 1860.
"To the officers and men of my command, the employés of the quartermaster's department, and our guides, my thanks are due for the zeal, skill, energy and humanity which they displayed. To their zeal, skill and energy I attribute our success; and to their humanity the fact that we have brought into this post, alive and safe, the wrecks of fellow-beings we found on the banks of the Owyhee and Burnt rivers.
"List of emigrants who were with the train: Killed in the fight at the corral: Lewis Lawson, William Ottley, Charles Kishnell, Judson Cressey, John W. Myers, Mr. Otter, Mrs. Otter, Mary Otter, Emma Otter, Abbey Otter, Wesley Otter. Killed near Burnt river by the Indians: Alexis Vanorman, Abigail Vanorman, Marcus Vanorman, Charles Otter, Henry Otter, Samuel Gleason. Killed by the Indians on the Owyhee: Christopher Trimble. Killed or captured near Burnt river: Eliza Vanorman, Minerva Vanorman, Reuben Vanorman, Lucinda Vanorman. Died on the Owyhee of starvation: Daniel Chase, senior, Daniel Chase, junior, Albert Chase, Elizabeth Trimble, an infant (Otter's). Reported, by Snider, as killed by Indians on Wallen's road: Shaumberg, Murdock. Came in, and was relieved by the Indian department: Henry Snider. Came into the Umatilla agency: Joseph Reith, Jacob Reith. Found by the command and brought to Walla Walla: Civilian G. Munson, Charles M. Chaffee, Joseph Myers, Mary E. Myers, Isabella Myers, Margaret Myers, Eugene Myers, Harriet Myers, Carrie Myers, Emeline Trimble, Elizabeth Chase, Mary Chase.
F.T. DENT,
Captain Ninth Infantry, commanding expedition."

Utter Map
Massacre on the Oregon Trail in the Year 1860 A Tale of Horror, Cannibalism & Three Remarkable Children.By Carl Schlicke

Fort Dent (Tukwila WA) was named after Captain Frederick T. Dent, U.S. Army, who was said to have supervised construction of the building. Dent eventually became a Colonel in the Civil War and was a member of General Ulysses S. Grant's staff (General Grant married Dent's sister, Julia). see also - http://www.historylink.org/essays/output.cfm?file_id=4114

Fort Hoskins
In 1856, the US government established a fort in Benton County known as Ft. Hoskins, and the post office of Hoskins was named in memory of the fort. Although Ft. Hoskins is now nothing more than a memory, there was a time when it was an important post. Several officers who later achieved prominence in the military establishment were at one time in command at Ft. Hoskins or were stationed there. Cpt. Christopher C. Augur was there in the late 1850s. He was later a major general. Cpt. Frederick T. Dent, later a brigadier general, was commandant at Ft. Hoskins in 1861. He was the brother of Ms. U. S. Grant. Gen. Philip H. Sheridan in his Personal Memoirs, V. I, p. 97, says "I spent many happy months at Ft. Hoskins."
Data about most of the early military establishments in Oregon are neither plentiful nor accurate, but fortunately there is a good account of the history and physical facts of Ft. Hoskins. This information is in an article by Col. Oscar W. Hoop, US Army, with the title “History of Fort Hoskins, 1856-1865,” Oregon Historical Quarterly, V. 30, p. 346. Ft. Hoskins was established as the result of the concentration of Indians at Siletz Agency and was named in honor of Lt. Chas. Hoskins who was killed in the battle of Monterey, Mexico, September 21, 1846. Cpt. Christopher C. Augur, Fourth Infantry, and his command reached Kings Valley July 25, 1856, and according to army records printed in Oregon Historical Quarterly, V 36, p. 59, Ft. Hoskins was established the next day. It was on Luckiamute River near the mouth of what is now known as Bonner Creek, probably on land owned by Rowland Chambers, later by Cpt. Franz.
There was an incident concerning the beautiful Indian maiden and Lt. H. H. Garber. On duty at Ft. Hoskins, he became acquainted with the young Woman in the early spring of 1850. She was soon visiting the reputedly “very handsome” officer in his quarters and then moving in, apparently tolerated by fellow officers until her parents complained, not so much on moral grounds as they needed her at home. Hoping to put an end to the affair, Cpt. Christopher Colon Augur sent Garber to Ft. Vancouver to cool off, but reckoned without the persistence of the young squaw who walked all the way to the fort on the Columbia to rejoin her lover. Garber was returned to Ft. Hoskins and brought before Augur for a dressing down and a warning to stop seeing the young woman. This was supposed to end the matter but the Indian maiden was again discovered in the lieutenant's rooms. Again sent for by Augur, tempers flared on both sides and Garber made some insubordinate remarks. He was sentenced to six months in the guardhouse but died of unstated causes on Oct. 12, 1859. He was buried in the Kings Valley Cemetery, his grave identified only by the regular army marker for the time. Then his fellow soldiers contributed funds for a marble marker which was still standing in 1965. Ironically, as though pointing up his ill luck his name is misspelled. - http://users.wi.net/~census/lesson9.html

------------------------
George Thomas Controversies

George Thomas was 'regular army' and strongly believed in army protocol. And although he had as much professional ambition as the rest of the General Officer corps, his strict sense of ethics did not allow for the playing of 'politics' for promotion. He believed that the only allowance for an officer to be promoted over his senior was when that officer recently performed with great distinction on the battlefield. His sense of loyalty to his commanding officer and the army twice made him turn down promotions when he thought it was not justified under army protocol. It also made him protest an appointment of a superior in command to someone who was less senior to him. But when the officer was made 'senior' by an act of the president, Thomas readily accepted the officer (Rosecrans) as his commander. Unfortunately, Thomas had a hard time believing that other regular army officers might not have the same strict code of ethics as himself. Or that a superior in command might not give give him the credit he earned on the battlefield. The following web pages will explore Thomas' relationship with three generals: Grant, Sherman and Schofield - all these men would become head of the Army and played their part during the war and afterwards in minimizing the accomplishments of General Thomas in the eyes of the general public to the point that, after the Civil War veterans passed away, Thomas was lost to history. Note that this is one person's opinion and currently not the popular one. You are invited to research this further and form your own opinion. 1. Grant and Thomas: A Classic Case of Micro-Management - Bad for Business; Deadly for Armies"
Grant and Thomas: December, 1864 by Stephen Z. Starr. Courtesy of the Cincinnati Civil War Round Table.
"The Starr paper does a masterful job of explaining why Grant mistreated Thomas during the Nashville campaign. Sometime after he took command of the Western Theatre, I think (opinion alert) Grant made an assessment of his top subordinates to see which ones could challenge him for his job based on ability. He decided that Thomas was the one to worry about. He then proceeded to limit Thomas' opportunities as much as he could (he had no choice in giving Thomas command of the Army of the Cumberland after his heroic performance at Chickamauga as that army and Lincoln would accept no one else). I believe the true reason for limiting Thomas was that Grant was worried that one day Lincoln would realize that Thomas' ability to win battles with minimum casualties by orchestrating infantry, artillery and cavalry for maximum effect and his uncanny ability to improvise on the battlefield, as conditions changed, would make him a perfect candidate to replace Grant if Grant stumbled or if his straight-ahead style became too great a price for the nation to pay. In reality, Thomas, a Virginian, had little chance of the top job due to the influence of the Ohio (and also, in the case of Grant, the Illinois) congressional delegations who were quite impressive in forwarding the careers of Grant, Sherman and Sheridan, et al but apparently Grant, who seemed somewhat in awe of Thomas, did not want to chance it. However Grant's persecution of Thomas goes farther back than Nashville. Some historians say it started in May of 1862 due to his resentment of having his Army of the Tennessee given to Thomas when Halleck kicked Grant 'upstairs' as his second in command and left him without an active job. Grant's promotion of his friend General Sherman over Thomas after Chattanooga did the trick of keeping Thomas 'buried' until very late in the war (Nashville). Grant rationalized his decision by stating in his memoirs that Sherman was more aggressive. Yet up to that point in the war, Sherman had done very little (if anything) to indicate he had much capacity for independent command while Thomas was a proven winner since early 1862 at Mill Springs. At this point, in any discussion of the abilities of the various Generals, someone will invariably say, 'yes, but Thomas was slow'. This is simply repeating a carefully concocted impression by both Grant and Sherman during the war and especially in their memoirs* afterwards to justify, in the case of Grant, not promoting Thomas for merit, and in the case of Sherman, that Grant made a good choice in picking him over Thomas. In reality, punctuality was one of Thomas' quirks. He hated to be late. For example, if he had a part in a coordinated battle plan, he was never late. He did always try to get his ducks in a row before committing his men to the shock of battle, but he always did so as fast as possible. His comprehensive battle planning was really the beginning of the modern Army. At Nashville, it was ironic that Grant chastised Thomas for taking so long to bring on battle (two weeks delay due to remount of cavalry and ice storm) while at the same time, Grant had been going nowhere fast against General Lee at Petersburg for nearly six months. After Thomas' resounding victory at Nashville, Grant rewarded him by taking away his infantry (because he was 'too slow') to make sure he had no more opportunity to outshine Sherman or himself. When Grant gave Sherman command of the Western theatre in early 1864, despite the fact that Thomas was senior to Sherman and despite the fact that it was Thomas' men not Sherman's that won the Battle of Chattanooga, General Thomas had good reason to resent the breech of army protocol but, to his everlasting credit, he quietly accepted a command under Sherman during the Atlanta campaign and exerted all his abilities to make the campaign and General Sherman successful. He never let personal issues detract him from his main goal of successfully ending the war.
*References: J.H. Sherratt: Some Corrections of Grant's Memoirs as Regards General George H. Thomas; in Commandery of the State of Illinois, MOLLUS, Military Essays and Recollections, vol. II, pg. 499-514, Chicago, IL 1894.
2. Sherman and Thomas: What Happened to Thomas' Plan for Snake Creek Gap?
"General Sherman's decision on his plan of attack for the first major movement of the Atlanta campaign in May, 1864 was very revealing of his inner thinking. There he was, three years into the war, and he had not really done anything noteworthy on his own. But then he found himself in command of the Western armies and wanted to distinguish himself and shape history in his image even to the point of discounting a brilliant tactical plan offered by his ablest subordinate apparently because he thought too much credit might accrue to Thomas and the Army of the Cumberland."...."Decisions like this and Kennesaw Mountain where Sherman overruled Thomas' advice and which totally backfired on him must have galled him considerably. It may explain his disparaging comments about Thomas that he made behind Thomas' back despite the fact that they both considered themselves best of friends. In a letter to Grant written just before he found out about Thomas' tremendous victory at Nashville, he wrote, "I know full well that Gen. Thomas is slow in mind and in action...". With 'friends' like this no wonder Thomas was lost to history." 3. Schofield and Thomas: Blind Ambition at Nashville
John M. Schofield graduated in the West Point class of 1853, but not before being dismissed first and then being re-instated. Schofield’s dislike for General Thomas started at this time. George H. Thomas was an instructor there and a member of Schofield’s court of inquiry for an incident of lewd behavior towards several cadet candidates that Schofield was responsible for, which cost the candidates a chance of passing their entrance exams. McKinney writes: "The Schofield court was one of the disciplinary measures in which Thomas became involved during this tour of duty. The enmity of John M. Schofield toward Thomas is a matter of history. It probably started at this time. The trouble began on June 18, 1852, when the class of 1856 were presenting themselves as candidates for admission. Schofield had been detailed to instruct a section of these candidates in mathematics so that they could pass their entrance examinations. Four of the candidates failed in this course and three of these had been members of Schofield’s section. The record of the Schofield court is restricted material because its publication might embarrass the descendents of the accused, but from the correspondence that passed between West Point and the chief engineer of the army it is evident what happened. Schofield permitted his class to be turned into a burlesque by making the uses of their procreative and eliminative organs the subject of a blackboard examination. In reporting the affair to the Secretary of War, Schofield’s offense was called disgraceful and exemplary punishment was recommended. The Secretary agreed and Schofield was dismissed from the Academy. Two weeks later this decision was reconsidered [due to the intervention of Senator Stephen A. Douglas who, as Schofield says, ‘was the kind of man I had looked for in vain up to that time’] and the matter was referred to a court of inquiry. Thomas served as a member of this court. In his autobiography, Schofield states that he was sentenced to be dismissed, and that Thomas and one other officer were the only ones of thirteen members who declined to vote for remission of the sentence. The identity of these votes, however, Schofield claimed he did not learn until two years before Thomas’ death when, as Secretary of War, he gained access to the transcript of the court’s proceedings."1 It will take some time, but John Schofield will do his best to get revenge. At the start of the Civil War, Major Schofield was the adjutant to General Lyon in Missouri and fought at the Battle of Wilson’s Creek where Lyon was killed. Much later, when he was commander-in-chief of the army in the 1890’s, Schofield would get himself awarded the Medal of Honor apparently for some charge that he ordered at Wilson's Creek in which no one followed him. Later, he seemed to be so ashamed of his blatant string–pulling that he did not mention the award in his autobiography. Although fighting in no other major battles, he shows up in 1864 in Tennessee a Major General, and is appointed to command the Army of the Ohio. It pays to have friends.Later, when the planning is being done for the March to the Sea, it is odd that Schofield does not lobby for a command under Sherman where it is presumed that the opportunity for glory would be, but instead, asks to remain behind under Thomas. It turns out he knows he will be senior to all others serving with Thomas and thus will be automatically second-in-command. Opportunity appears to be knocking. While Thomas goes to Nashville to organize his pick-up army, he orders Schofield to shadow Hood from the Georgia border, and slow him down if possible, but in no way bring on a major engagement with Hood. Schofield appeared befuddled, and would have been caught at Spring Hill, but for an untimely miscue from the Confederate leadership. He fell back to the Harpeth River at Franklin and prepared to fight a defensive battle. He went with the trains across the river, and left Stanley and Cox to fight the battle on the south side. There was a terribly fierce fight, and in part due to Hood's decision for a frontal charge over long open ground, the Union was successful. The next day, Schofield’s army entered the lines at Nashville. It was Dec 1, 1864. Thomas was both forming a defense at Nashville using civilian quartermaster troops and equipping a cavalry force for attack and pursuit. From this time on, he was getting harsh telegrams from U.S. Grant at first urging then ordering him to attack at once despite the state of his forces or the weather. Thomas began to smell a rat. The author Freeman Cleaves picks up the story: "Freezing weather still hung on. Fuel was consumed at a great rate, but although Thomas had woodcutters out every day, there were no big fires for the soldiers to warm themselves. Only fires for cooking were allowed. No day was complete without a nagging telegram from Grant. "If you delay attacking longer, the mortifying spectacle will be witnessed of a rebel army moving for the Ohio, and you will be forced to act, accepting such weather as you find," the General-in-Chief wired on the eleventh. "Delay no longer for weather and re-enforcements. But it was hardly possible for Hood to move if Thomas could not. "I will obey the order as promptly as possible, however much I may regret it, as the attack will have to be made under every disadvantage", replied Thomas in a stubborn frame of mind. "The whole country is covered with a perfect sheet of ice and sleet, and it is with difficulty that the troops are able to move about on level ground." General Whipple, Thomas’s chief of staff, began to declare that someone was using the wires to undermine his commander at Washington. Thomas sent for Steedman, able veteran of Chickamauga. Could it be Governor Johnson? he asked. Steedman did not think so. He had talked with Johnson and knew him to be aboveboard at least. Thomas suggested that he look into the matter. Steedman returned to his headquarters and assigned some detective work to an aide. This officer, Captain Marshall Davis, went to the telegraph office and picked up a message from Schofield to Grant: "Many officers here are of the opinion that General Thomas is certainly too slow in his movements." Steedman hastened with the message to Thomas, who examined it carefully and inquired, "Steedman, can it be possible that Schofield would sent such a telegram?" Steedman remarked that Thomas should be familiar with the handwriting of his own general. Thomas put on his glasses and held up the message before the light. "Yes, it is General Schofield’s handwriting…Why does he send such telegrams?" Several years later Steedman recalled that he "smiled at the noble old soldier’s simplicity and said: ‘General Thomas, who is next in command to you, and would succeed you in case of removal?’ ‘Oh, I see,’ he said as he mournfully shook his head."2 Did Schofield really undermine General Thomas in the mind of Grant? Or did Grant merely use Schofield as a convenient Judas? We may never know. Did Schofield ever feel remorse for his actions? Apparently not. Here is what he says in his memoirs: "Time works legitimate "revenge", and makes all things even. When I was a boy at West Point I was court-martialed for tolerating some youthful "deviltry" of my classmates, in which I took no part myself, and was sentenced to be dismissed. Thomas, then already a veteran soldier, was a member of the court, and he and one other were the only ones of the thirteen members who declined to recommend that the sentence be remitted. This I learned in 1868, when I was Secretary of War. Only twelve years later I was able to repay this unknown stern denial of clemency to a youth by saving the veteran soldier’s army from disaster, and himself from the humiliation of dismissal from command on the eve of victory."3 Considering that he was doing his best to get Thomas dismissed, this is obviously pure fantasy. He then goes on to state his considered opinion of Thomas as a commander: "I believe it must now be fully known to all who are qualified to judge and have had by personal association or by study of history full opportunities to learn the truth, that General Thomas did not possess in a high degree the activity of mind necessary to foresee and provide for all the exigencies of military operations, nor the mathematical talent required to estimate "the relations of time, space, motion, and force" involved in great problems of war." With this smear of Thomas' military abilities, he goes on to inform us that it was he who was the real mastermind of the Nashville victory. He stated that he made some suggested changes to the plan that turned the tide, and that Thomas never gave him credit for it. O’Connor in his book "Thomas: Rock of Chickamauga", quotes from a newspaper article written by General Steedman, the man who rode to the sound of the guns at a critical time at the Battle of Chickamauga, which refutes General Schofield’s attempt at 'ex post facto' glory: "In the New York Times of June 22, 1881, was quoted an article in the Northern Ohio Democrat of Toledo by General Steedman. The article read: Robbing a grave of a body is a light crime compared with stealing the honors which rightfully belong to a dead illustrious patriot. The letter of General J. M. Schofield, claiming that he suggested changes in the battle of Nashville which were adopted by General George H. Thomas, surpasses in cheek and falsehood all the absurd lies about the war we have ever read. Schofield’s claim to a part of the laurels that encircled the brow of the grand old "Rock of Chickamauga" makes the self-lauding fiction written by General Sherman a modest production. There are four living witnesses—Generals Wood, Smith, Wilson and Steedman—who were in the council of war held in the St. Cloud Hotel, in Nashville, presided over by General Thomas, all of whom can testify that General Schofield states a deliberate falsehood when he says that, as the ranking officer next to the commanding general, he waived his right to speak last and promptly sustained General Thomas. The truth is General Schofield did not speak at all until all the other generals had given their opinions, and then only said he would obey orders. General Schofield knew three days before the battle of Nashville that Schofield was playing the part of Judas, by telegraphing to General Grant at Washington disparaging suggestions about the action of Thomas, saying in one dispatch: "It is the opinion of all our officers with whom I have conversed that General Thomas is too tardy in moving against the enemy." It was known to a number of our officers that, pending the battle, which was postponed for several days by Thomas because our army could not move on account of the earth being covered with ice for miles around Nashville, produced by a heavy rain freezing as it fell, Schofield was intriguing with Grant to get Thomas relieved in order that he might succeed to the command of our army as the General next in rank to Thomas. The character of Schofield as an ambitious, unscrupulous intriguer caused suspicion to fall upon him as the person who was disparaging General Thomas at Washington, and he was watched and exposed to Thomas as a deceitful, unfaithful subordinate who was engaged in a plot to relieve and disgrace his commander, the ablest, most honored and dearly loved soldier of the Army of the Cumberland. It was Major General George H. Thomas who planned and fought the battle of Nashville on his own plan, and General Schofield had nothing to do with originating or modifying that plan, nor did his command participate actively in the battle. Schofield’s command, the XXIII Corps, a magnificent body of gallant soldiers, was in reserve, did very little fighting in the battle of Nashville, and suffered but a trifling loss in the engagement. The infantry forming our line of battle was under the command of General A. J. Smith, who commanded the right; General Wood, who commanded the center; and General Steedman, who commanded the left. The right was protected by our cavalry under the command of the gallant General Wilson. General Schofield was ordered by General Thomas to support General Smith with his command, and while in the execution of the order a portion of his command was engaged and lost a few men. We were not in the battle of Franklin, but we know from the statements made to us by hundreds of soldiers who were in that battle that it was Generals Stanley and Cox who commanded the troops in the field, while General Schofield, who now seeks to rob the brave and skillful officers who were with the troops and commanding them of the honor due them, was on the north side of the Harpeth River, two miles from Carter’s Hill, where the battle was fought. It was an intrepid, heroic Ohio soldier—General Opdyke—who, seeing the peril of our troops when the rebels broke through our lines, ordered his men with the bayonet to drive back the enemy, gallantly led them to execute his orders and saved the army. Stanley was badly wounded in the fight. Cox, although exposed to the balls of the enemy, nobly did his duty and escaped unhurt. Opdyke, who was promoted for his heroism, passed the ordeal unscathed. During the whole of the terrible bloody fighting of the battle of Franklin, the nominal commander, the man who had the right to command by virtue of his rank, and who would have been personally in command if he had not been an exceedingly cautious man, comes forward now and claims to be not only the hero of Franklin, but the wise and able general whose suggestions gave victory to General Thomas’ army at Nashville. In the name of the grand hero who sleeps in his honored grave, we protest against the recognition of the false, infamous claim of Schofield, whom we brand as the slanderer of both the living and dead soldiers of the Army of the Cumberland. We do not say that General Schofield is a rank coward, but we can, from personal knowledge, safely state that he possesses the "rascally virtue called caution" in an eminent degree. We know from remarks we heard him make at Chattanooga that he envied and hated Thomas because the soldiers loved and honored him. The ambition of Schofield was boundless, and his military career an utter failure. He may have been under fire, but he was never exposed to the balls of the enemy to our knowledge, and we served under him for some time. He had several opportunities while we were under his command to get in range of the bullets of the enemy, but we never knew him to be reckless enough to expose his carcass to the fire of the rebels."4 General John M. Schofield was one of those despicable men that rose to the top of their profession by a combination of back-stabbing and brown-nosing. The end result is that he is rightfully forgotten. He wrote a book in 1897 entitled "Forty-Six Years in the Army" dwelling on a lackluster career that no one cares to remember. Oddly, this tome was republished as a paperback in 1998. The best that the publisher could say about the book in the Forward was, "It merits reissue, both for what it tells us about Schofield and his times and for what it tells us about ambition …" see References at site-
SCHOFIELD'S DEFINITION OF DISCIPLINE.
"The discipline which makes the soldiers of a free country reliable in battle is not to be gained by harsh or tyrannical treatment. On the contrary, such treatment is far more likely to destroy than to make an army. It is possible to impart instructions and to give commands in such a manner and in such a tone of voice as to inspire in the soldier no feeling but and intense desire to obey, while the opposite manner and tone of voice cannot fail to excite strong resentment and a desire to disobey. The one mode or other of dealing with subordinates springs from a corresponding spirit in the breast of the commander. He who feels the respect which is due others cannot fail to inspire in them regard for himself; while he who feels, and hence manifests, disrespect toward other, especially his inferiors, cannot fail to inspire hatred against himself."
- MG John M. Schofield, in an address to the Corps of Cadets, 11 August 1879
------------------------
From Shrman's Memoirs
CHAPTER XIV.
CHATTANOOGA AND KNOXVILLE.
JULY TO DECEMBER, 1863.

a telegraph-message from General Grant at Chattanooga, addressed to me through General George Crook, commanding at Huntsville, Alabama, to this effect:
Drop all work on Memphis & Charleston Railroad, cross the Tennessee and hurry eastward with all possible dispatch toward Bridgeport, till you meet further orders from me.
U. S. GRANT.
The bearer of this message was Corporal Pike, who described to me, in his peculiar way, that General Crook had sent him in a canoe; that he had paddled down the Tennessee River, over Muscle Shoals, was fired at all the way by guerrillas, but on reaching Tuscumbia he had providentially found it in possession of our troops. He had reported to General Blair, who sent him on to me at Iuka. This Pike proved to be a singular character; his manner attracted my notice at once, and I got him a horse, and had him travel with us eastward to about Elkton, whence I sent him back to General Crook at Huntsville; but told him, if I could ever do him a personal service, he might apply to me. The next spring when I was in Chattanooga, preparing for the Atlanta campaign, Corporal Pike made his appearance and asked a fulfillment of my promise. I inquired what he wanted, and he said he wanted to do something bold, something that would make him a hero. I explained to him, that we were getting ready to go for Joe Johnston at Dalton, that I expected to be in the neighborhood of Atlanta about the 4th of July, and wanted the bridge across the Savannah River at Augusta, Georgia, to be burnt about that time, to produce alarm and confusion behind the rebel army. I explained to Pike that the chances were three to one that he would be caught and hanged; but the greater the danger the greater seemed to be his desire to attempt it. I told him to select a companion, to disguise himself as an East Tennessee refugee, work his way over the mountains into North Carolina, and at the time appointed to float down the Savannah River and burn that bridge. In a few days he had made his preparations and took his departure. The bridge was not burnt, and I supposed that Pike had been caught and hanged.
When we reached Columbia, South Carolina, in February, 1865, just as we were leaving the town, in passing near the asylum, I heard my name called, and saw a very dirty fellow followed by a file of men running toward me, and as they got near I recognized Pike. He called to me to identify him as one of my men; he was then a prisoner under guard, and I instructed the guard to bring him that night to my camp some fifteen miles up the road, which was done. Pike gave me a graphic narrative of his adventures, which would have filled a volume; told me how he had made two attempts to burn the bridge, and failed; and said that at the time of our entering Columbia he was a prisoner in the hands of the rebels, under trial for his life, but in the confusion of their retreat he made his escape and got into our lines, where he was again made a prisoner by our troops because of his looks. Pike got some clothes, cleaned up, and I used him afterward to communicate with Wilmington, North Carolina. Some time after the war, he was appointed a lieutenant of the Regular, Cavalry, and was killed in Oregon, by the accidental discharge of a pistol. Just before his death he wrote me, saying that he was tired of the monotony of garrison-life, and wanted to turn Indian, join the Cheyennes on the Plains, who were then giving us great trouble, and, after he had gained their confidence, he would betray them into our hands. Of course I wrote him that he must try and settle down and become a gentleman as well as an officer, apply himself to his duties, and forget the wild desires of his nature, which were well enough in time of war, but not suited to his new condition as an officer; but, poor fellow I (learned) he was killed by an accident, which probably saved him from a slower but harder fate.
- http://www.sonofthesouth.net/union-generals/sherman/memoirs/general-sherman-chattanooga-knoxville.htm

------------------------
Sheridan & Crook

U.S. Military Academy Archives
Philip Sheridan, George Crook, left, and John Nugen.
Crook served under Sheridan in the Civil War and again later against the Plains Indians.
Phil Sheridan was born on March 6, 1831 in Albany, the capital of New York, or at least that was one of the dates and places he gave. He, and other people as well, have also given others. He had first believed he was born in Ohio, but his mother, Mary Meenagh Sheridan, later told him he had been born in Albany; later still she told the Sheridan Monument Association that he had been born at sea during the voyage from their home in County Cavan, Ireland. The other strong possibility is that he was actually born in Co. Cavan before they began the trip over. That is what the people of Cavan believe and it may be true. Being born in Ireland was a liability during the dark days of the anti-Irish Know Nothing Party (click here) in the U.S. His mother's numerous changes in the story of his birth would seem unnecessary if he had actually been born here. Irish birth could account for the lack of any record or witnesses of his birth in any United States location, however. But whether he was born on the Ol' Sod or somewhere over here, two things are certain: his ancestry was Irish, and he is considered one of the three greatest Union commanders of the American Civil War, along with Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman. Sheridan grew up in Somerset, Ohio, a small frontier village where his father, John, had moved the family to work on the National Road. As a youngster, Phil would sometimes use a tin sword while putting his friends through military drills, perhaps dreaming of future glories on the battlefield. Phil grew strong in Somerset, though not very tall -- he would one day top out at 5 feet 5 inches - but there was a big man trapped in that little body. He got into enough altercations around town to earn a reputation as fighter; his later life would do nothing to diminish that early assessment.
In March 1848 Sheridan acquired an appointment to West Point when the original appointee flunked the mathematics section of the entrance exam; this was fortuitous for the later fate of the Union. Sheridan's education had also been weak in the area of mathematics, but he was fortunate to have Henry Slocum, a future Civil War general himself, and a former school teacher, as a roommate that first year. Slocum's tutoring helped Sheridan get by in math, barely. The most noteworthy incident of Sheridan's West Point career occurred in his third year and it was very nearly the last thing he ever did there. Insulted by the tone of an order by Cadet Sgt. William Terrill, a Virginian, Sheridan broke ranks, yelling, "God damn you, sir, I'll run you through!" and he very nearly did before regaining control. The next day the two came to blows. With Sheridan's only excuse for the entire problem being the improper tone used by Terrill in issuing an order, he was very lucky to escape with a one-year suspension. If West Point officials expected to see a contrite Phil Sheridan on his return, they were mistaken. He fell only seven demerits shy of being automatically dismissed from the school and finished 34th out of 49. Several other members of that class of '53 would also become well-known during the war, including John Schofield, John Bell Hood, James McPherson (1st in the class), and Joshua Sill.
As was generally the case with low-ranking West Point graduates then, Sheridan ended up in the infantry. His advance was slow, even by pre-war Regular Army standards. After eight years serving with the 4th Infantry in Texas and in the Northwest, he was still a 2nd lieutenant when pre-war officer resignations opened the way for him to rise in the ranks. Like many other Civil War officers, Sheridan's army career would probably have been undistinguished without the war intervening.
Even with the coming of the war there was little in the first few months of Phil Sheridan's war service to make anyone believe he would one day command vast numbers of troops. Promoted to captain, he was Union Army commander Henry Halleck's quartermaster during the campaign for Corinth, Mississippi. Though most thought Sheridan did a fine job in the post, personal problems with Gen. Samuel Curtis led him to ask for a transfer. At the time of the Battle of Shiloh, he was even further from the action of the war, buying horses in the Midwest. To this point, Sheridan's war career resembled his prewar-war career, but his fortunes were about to change.
Intent on asking Halleck for a field command, he hurried back to St. Louis, but Halleck had gone to Pittsburg Landing to confer with Grant. As fate would have it, Halleck's adjutant general was a West Point classmate of Sheridan's, Col. John Kelton, and he issued orders for Phil to report to Halleck at the front. After a brief time undertaking more supply duties, Sheridan came to the attention of Michigan Gov. Austin Blair, who appointed him colonel of the 2nd Michigan Cavalry on May 25, 1862. Sheridan had once told another officer, "If I could get into line duty I believe I could do something." Now was his chance. Could he live up to his prediction?
When he finally reached the action, Sheridan was as good as his word. His performance and rise in the ranks would be steady and spectacular. He was now on a course that would not end until he one day succeeded Sherman in command of the entire U.S. Army. - Joseph E. Gannon - http://www.corvalliscommunitypages.com/Americas/US/Oregon/corvallis/phil_sheridanall.htm
Rich Grippaldi: "General Philip H. Sheridan remains a controversial figure in American military history. George Crook, a controversial figure in his own right, whose military career crossed paths with Sheridan’s several times, said of the latter on his death, “The adulations heaped upon him by a grateful nation for his supposed genius turned his head, which, added to his natural disposition, caused him to bloat his little carcass with debauchery and dissipation, which carried him off prematurely.” Crook believed Sheridan stole credit for two great victories in the Shenandoah Valley properly belonging to Crook, which ruined their a prewar friendship.... most authorities believe Crook, indeed, deserved credit for the flank attacks at Winchester and Fisher’s Hill that helped cement Sheridan’s standing. For a general whose aggressiveness has passed down to present-day as legendary, Sheridan lost much of his ardor for fighting in the Valley after Cedar Creek.
Sheridan’s lieutenants, they all were prominent Indian fighters. But Crook’s successes in the Southwest came from his unorthodox tactics, and he proved less effective fighting the Sioux. Custer’s aggressiveness got him in trouble in the 1860s, and got him killed a decade later. Mackenzie proved a skilled professional, but insanity prematurely snuffed out his career while Sheridan was still commanding in the West. Wesley Merritt enjoyed a long career, retiring after the Spanish-American War. Given the excruciatingly slow rate of promotion in the postwar army, however, Merritt’s perseverance is as much testament to an iron constitution and a determination to remain in service, as to anything he might have learned at Sheridan’s elbow." - Rich Grippaldi - http://www.temple.edu/cenfad/strategic-visions/SV-Fall2005/reviews-grippaldi.html
Sheridan did little or nothing to correct any popular misconceptions about his actual role in the battle, and some of his friends did not appreciate it. Crook claimed that at the Belle Grove campfire that night, Sheridan told him "Crook, I am going to get much more credit for this than I deserve, for, had I been here in the morning, the same thing would have taken place." After Crook's only return visit to the field in 1889, he wrote "After twenty-five years...it renders Gen. Sheridan's claims and his subsequent actions in allowing the general public to remain under the impressions regarding his part in these battles, when he knew they were fiction, all the more contemptible. The adulations heaped on him by a grateful nation for his supposed genius turned his head, which, added to his natural disposition, caused him to bloat his little carcass with debauchery and dissipation, which carried him off prematurely." And these had been close friends! - http://users.aol.com/dmsmith001/cedar.html
Historian Robert Utley wrote, "General George Crook [was] considered by many of his contemporaries to be the army's most skilled Indian fighter...." Whether Crook was the greatest Indian fighter can be argued, but he was never an Indian hater. He must be regarded as one of the Army's greatest Indian friends..."
"Sheridan did not understand Chiricahuas (Apaches) and criticized Crook's methods. Crook tried to explain, but finally just asked for a transfer. He was ordered to the Department of the Platte again, where he continued to fight against the shameful treatment of Geronimo and his band after their 1886 surrender (to Miles brought about by Gatewood see below). The government even imprisoned most of the Apaches who had been loyal, trusted scouts for years."
"Crook kept the peace with the Plains Indians, and in 1888 President Grover Cleveland promoted him to major general and placed him in charge of the huge Department of the Missouri. On March 21, 1890, Crook suffered a heart attack and died. Captain John G. Bourke, his aide for many years, reported that at the Camp Apache reservation, his scouts formed a large circle, bent their heads and cried. Red Cloud said, "His words gave the people hope. He died. Their hope died again." - J. Jay Myers - http://www.thehistorynet.com/we/blgeorgecrookindianfighter/
Sheridan's Memoirs -http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/2/6/5/2651/2651.txt

----------------------

Lyman Kidder was born at Braintree, Vermont, on 31st August, 1842. He joined the army in 1861 and served in the Curtis Horse Regiment and the 5th Iowa Cavalry. Kidder then joined the 1st Minnesota Mounted Rangers and fought in the battles of Big Mound (24th July, 1863), Buffalo Lake (July, 26, 1863) and Stony Mound (28th July, 1863). In August 1864 Kidder joined the Minnesota Cavalry and for the next two years was stationed at Fort Ripley. In January 1867 Kidder was commissioned a second lieutenant of the 2nd Cavalry. He served in Kansas and took part in the Indian Wars.
On 29th June, 1867, Kidder, with an Indian scout, and ten enlisted men, was ordered to take dispatches from General William Sherman to General George A. Custer, who was camped on the Republican River in Nebraska. Kidder never arrived and on 12th July, Custer's scout, Will Comstock, found the mutilated bodies of the Kidder party. It was later discovered the men were killed by a war party of Cheyenne and Sioux warriors.
----------------------
I found this reviewer - Kosto Barry Granlundof - on Amazon and find his reviews echo many of my own opinions on Hollywood and History - for example consider his spot on evaluation of Dances with Wolves:
"Total NONSENSE in the most Politically Correct sense of the term!, December 6, 2005 Some reviews on here describe this film as "educational" and I wonder why? Perhaps its because anything that reeks of the warm-fuzzy, Political Correctness that is being passed off as "Accurate" frontier history these days is taken to be "educational" by those who feel Hollywood is in a position to offer them an "education" on anything. In reality, this film is the most grossly distorted version of both frontier history on the Northern Plains AND Indian life before reservation confinement that I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot! The Sioux Indians are shown here as being some sort of Red Aristocrats or Noble Sages in feathers. The US Army personnel are crude, ignorant, and barbaric. The "hero" comes to his senses and opts for life with the Noble Red Men and forsakes his duty and his race. And, to top it all off, the Nobel Red Men have charitably raised an orphaned White girl who is the perfect love interest for the hero once he sheds his race, heritage, and lifestyle! Well, well, well, how nicey nice! Now let's get back to REALITY and HISTORIC FACT! The Sioux Indians were among the most warlike and brutal of all northern Plains Indians. Just ask the Kiowa, Pawnee ( villified in this movie, by the way) and Crows, who were targeted for extermination by the Sioux long before Whites showed up on the scene. The Sioux actually pushed their way onto the northern Plains from out of southeastern Canada just after the French and Indian War, and they ruthlessly attacked the tribes who already occupied what is now Minnesota, the Dakotas, and Wyoming...no politically correct "peace and love" practiced by the REAL Sioux toward other Indians or European settlers either! Futhermore, the Sioux tortured, butchered, and slaughtered Whites (young and old) who fell into their clutches, they did not adopt them and make them tribal members ( there are more documented incidents of such torture/mutilation/slaughter including photographs to be found in the National Archives and Smithsonian than you can shake a stick at!) Equally, the Pawnee were horribly victimized by the Sioux due to being outnumbered almost ten to one, yet the Pawnee (and even more so, the Crow) out fought the Sioux and were highly valued Army Allies and Scouts. Read "The Pawnee Indians" available right here at amazon.com for more details. These are just a FEW FACTS which, once known, make movies like this one seem so far-fetched that it becomes an ordeal to watch them at all. For those of you who want to break out of the Politically Correct SPELL of "Fiction as History" perpetrated by Hollywood, I recommend reading THREE YEARS AMONG THE COMANCHES and LIFE AMONG THE APACHES and if the Sioux in particular are of some interest to you, then by all means read SCALP DANCE as soon as you can! These are three books (found here at amazon.com) that will open your eyes about life on the frontier, about Indians and their habits, and about the interaction between Whites and Indians. The first two mentioned are first-hand accounts ( one by a captive and the other by a member of the famed California Militia, who dealt with Indians in Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, California, and Old Mexico before States existed in the Southwest.) The Third book is a chilling, hard-biting work consisting of actual documented and FACTUAL incidents on the frontier of what is now Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, the Dakotas, Wyoming, and Colorado. It is, without a doubt, the BEST Indian warfare book on the market. Read them all and then see if you can sit through another viewing of Dances With Wolves! I dare you! "
----------------------
7thCav-Vignettes

----------------------

Captain Gus Doane, 2nd U.S. Cavalry Gustavus Cheyney Doane was born in Galesburg, Illinois, on May 20, 1840, and grew up in California. He graduated from the University of the Pacific at Santa Clara in 1861, and afterwards enlisted in the "California Hundred," a federal volunteer unit absorbed by the Second Massachusetts Volunteer Cavalry. Doane attained the rank of sergeant by 1864 when he resigned to accept a commission as lieutenant with the first regiment, Mississippi Marine Brigade. After the war Doane lived for a time in Yazoo City, Mississippi where he was appointed mayor by the Reconstruction authorities in 1867. In 1868 he applied for a commission with the army and was appointed second lieutenant in the Second U.S. Cavalry. He served with the regiment for the next 24 years, attaining the rank of captain in 1884. During his postwar career Doane was stationed at a variety of frontier posts in Montana, California, and Arizona, including Fort Ellis, Fort Custer, Fort Keogh, Fort Maginnis, the Presidio, and Fort Bowie. He participated in the Sioux war of 1876, the Nez Pearce War of 1877, and the Apache campaign of 1886. Doane gained a great deal of fame as an explorer, having led the first systematic exploration of present day Yellowstone National Park in the early 1870s, a survey of the Judith Basin area in 1874, a trip down the Snake River in 1876-77, and the Howgate polar expedition in Greenland in 1880. Towards the end of his life, Doane attempted unsuccessfully to gain the superintendency of Yellowstone National Park and to influence widespread army acceptance for his invention, the Doane Centennial Tent. He married twice, to Amelia Link in 1866 and to Mary Lee Hunter in 1878. Neither union resulted in offspring. Gustavus Cheyney Doane died on May 5, 1892.-www.lib.montana.edu/collect/spcoll/findaid/2211.html
Capt. Gustavus Cheyney Doane was a lot like Dustin Hoffman in the film "Little Big Man," said MSU assistant professor and archivist Kim Allen Scott. He was always on the periphery of major western historical events and never at the center. Nevertheless, Doane was "one of the more interesting soldiers who ever wore the uniform," Scott said. Scott is writing a biography of the man who led the 1870 Washburn expedition into Yellowstone National Park. He's using Doane's exploration journals, a survey Doane did of the Judith Basin, the log from an attempted polar expedition, and letters Doane exchanged with his second wife, Mary, during the Geronimo campaign in Arizona. These original documents are in the special collections of the MSU Renne Library.-http://www.montana.edu/wwwpb/univ/round133.html
BATTLE DRUMS AND GEYSERS. The Life and Journals of Lt. Gustavus Cheyney Doane, Soldier and Explorer of the Yellowstone and Snake River Regions. Publisher: Chicago: Sage Books.. 1st Ed., xxv, 622p., ill., maps, bibliog., index. Doane's report on his 1870 exploration of the Yellowstone region helped influence Congress to establish the Yellowstone National Park in 1872.
Role in Marias MassacreAN UNCELEBRATED ANNIVERSARY by Stan Gibson

-----------------------

Charles B. Gatewood

Free Republic VetsCoR

Following Geronimo's surrender to Gen. Crook, on the way back to Arizona, Geronimo changed his mind and again escaped. As a result on April 1, Crook resigned his Command and was replaced on the 11th by Gen. Nelson Miles. After three months of unsuccessful pursuit, Miles determined to send an officer who was personally known by Geronimo to meet with the chief. This decision must have been particularly galling to Miles, as it meant a reversion to the tactics of George Crook. The only officer who personally knew Geronimo and his men was Lt. Charles B. Gatewood, known to the Indians as Bay-chen-daysen, "Long Nose." Gatewood would later serve at Fort McKinney, Wyo., at the time of the Johnson County War and was injured in the bombing of the barracks by the so-called "Red Sash Gang."

Gatewood, tall, thin, and sickly, at first refused the assignment into Mexico because of his ill health, but he was finally induced to undertake the mission by a promise of being appointed Miles' Aide de Camp. While on the mission into Mexico, Gatewood's health continued to visibly deteriorate, but he was refused a requested medical discharge by Leonard Wood. On August 25, after a month's search, Gatewood, with a contingent comprised of interpreters Martine (a Nednihi Chiricahua), George Wratten, Jesus Yestes, and Tom Horn; a soldier; and four Apache Scouts, came into contact with Geronimo's band at a bend of the Bavispe River.


Party from Geronimo Campaign.

Some question exists as to the identity of the persons in the photo. A handwritten note with the photo identified the individuals as the party that captured Geronimo. If so, the individuals would include Charles Gatewood, Martine, George Wratten, Jesus Yestes, Tom Horn, Kayitah, and possibly Tex Whaley and Frank Huston. An identification has also been made left to right: Groves, Mr Stevens, Chino, Stugh (front), Funston??, Tony, Furgerson, Leonard Wood.

After anxious moments, Geronimo appeared armed with a Winchester. Setting his weapon aside, Geronimo greeted Gatewood and inquired after Gatewood's obvious sickly appearance. After a full day's negotiation, the next morning Geronimo agreed to surrender to Gen. Miles, based on Gatewood's personal promise that Miles was honorable and his word was good; and on condition that Gatewood would personally travel with Geronimo's band to the place of surrender. American troops were to travel separately. It was agreed that the Chiricahuas would keep their weapons until they reached the place of surrender. Thus, the two bands separately traveled to Skeleton Canyon on the American side of the border. On the course of the journey when the two groups camped near each other, Lt. Abiel Smith in charge of the American unit, proposed to disarm the Apache in violation of Gatewood's agreement. Word of the proposal reached Geronimo, who, fearful that the Americans planned on murdering his band, again threatened to flee. Only intervention by Gatewood with Geronimo, and an angry confrontation by Gatewood with Smith and Leonard Wood, saved the situation.


Geronimo (on right), photo by C. S. Fly
With the surrender, Gatewood became, to Miles' consternation, the man of the hour with the press. Miles' actions have became a source of continuing controversy. Miles ordered Geronimo, his band, and the scouts who had loyally served the United States, exiled to Ft. Pickens and Ft. Marion in Florida and later to a fort in Alabama. Geronimo technically remained a prisoner of war for the remainder of his life and was never permitted to return to his native land. All who participated in the capture of Geronimo, except Gatewood, were honored and received promotions. On November 8, 1887, a celebratory reception was held at the San Xavier Hotel in Tucson to honor the officers who brought the Apache War to an end. Gatewood was not invited. In his post-humously published autobiography, (Tom) Horn took credit for the actions of Gatewood, indicating that it was he, Horn, whom Geronimo trusted and it was he, Horn, who convinced Geronimo to surrender. The autobiography is the only evidence of Horn's responsibility. Officially, Miles and Henry Lawton (later Major General) were given credit. Gatewood never received another promotion. He was nominated for the Medal of Honor for his actions in entering Geronimo's camp outnumbered, but the Medal was denied on the basis that Gatewood never came under actual hostile fire.

Assignment Geronimo

(As depicted in the Movie: Geronimo: An American Legend - 1993, A story being told by Lt Britton Davis. When Lts Charles Gatewood and Britton Davis are bringing in Geronimo the first time, Davis asks Gatewood if he is just going to come in and give himself up. Gatewood replies that that was what he promised. Gatewood then goes on to say that a Chiricahua doesn't give his word much but when he does he keeps it. In his book the "Truth About Geronimo" Britton Davis's own assessment of geronimo is as follows. "this indian was a thoroughly viscous, intractable and treacherous man. his only redeeming traits were courage and determination. HIS WORD, NO MATTER HOW EARNESTLY PLEADGED, WAS WORTHLESS." Davis also is depicted with Gatewood leading up to his meeting with Geronimo..he had in fact already resigned from the army. The Seiber character as portrayed in the movie is nearly all fictitious, including his death by gunfight, and not deserving of further comment.
Some Davis quotes:
"Kay-E-Ten-Ae - not a chief but a leader of the more turbulent spirits amongst the younger element. Even the chiefs were afraid of him. He was pure devil and began making trouble as soon as he arrived on the Reservation. When the Indians had all come from Mexico (they came up in several parties at intervals of several months, Geronimo's band being the last to arrive) General Crook sent me with them to Turkey Creek about 16 miles SW of Fort Apache, where I established camp. Beyond Sam Bowman (a half breed negro and Chocta) Mickey Free and a young Mexican interpreter, there were only Indians in the camp - all Chiracahuas or Warm Springs. Kay-E-Ten-Ae lost little time. The camp was hardly more than settled when he gave a tizwin party to a number of the most unruly young bucks, at which he prosed that they kill me and return to their old haunts in Mexico. The motion was amended to wait until they finished the drunk. A tizwin drunk usually lasted three days. The proposal was reported to me the same night by one of my secret service scouts (a woman). I arrested Kay-E-Ten-Ae the next morning and sent him to San Carlos for trial. He was convicted and sent to Alcatraz prison, where two years of confinement tamed him and he subsequently gave valuable aid to Gens Crook and Miles in ridding northern Mexico and our s.w. of the Indians who left the Reservation in the Spring of 1885 with Geronimo. The details of his arrest would be typical of the risks our officers ran in dealing with the Indians. Statement by Britton Davis. Geronimo was not a chief - not even a sub-chief. He made some pretensions to being a medicine man, but was not a success even at that as the Indians universally disliked him. He was extremely crafty and suspicious, but a man of very strong character and unusual ability as a warrior. These latter qualities account for his leadership. When he came on the Reservation in 1884 he brought with him a squaw who had been for several years a captive of the Mexicans and had lived for a time in the City of Chihuahua, This woman, Huera, had great influence over him and was a thorn in Britton Davis' side in dealing with Geronimo. For some reason she had acquired a deepseated hatred of the Whites and was a prominent factor in the outbreak of May 1885, when about one-fourth of the Chiracahuas and Warm Spring left the Reservation - one hundred and forty-three men, women and children out of a total of five hundred fifty-odd. Geronimo is reported to have said that Micky Free and Mr. Britton Davis was responsible for his leaving the Reservation. If he made such a statement, it was simply a lie to save his face. Micky Free had nothing whatever to do with it and the cause of the outbreak were matters entirely beyond my control. - Britton Davis" - http://gallery.unl.edu/picinfo/5744.html
"We have heard much talk of the treachery of the Indian. In treachery, broken pledges on the part of high officials, lies, thievery, slaughter of defenseless Isdzan and children, and every crime in the catalogue of man's inhumanity to man, the Indian was a mere amateur compared to the `noble white man.' His crimes were retail, ours wholesale." --U.S. Army Second Lieutenant Britton Davis


Here is an outstanding review by Kosto Barry Granlundof The Truth About Geronimo by Britton Davis
Good as it goes, better than most
Here is the point of view concerning a particular portion of the late Apache/Euro conflict involving the last rag-tag remnants of the Apache tribes and the United States Army units involved in trying to keep them subdued. Its an enjoyable read because the author gives a first-hand, eye-witness account of the series of incidents known as "The Geronimo Campaigns" and he does so without injecting the slobbering Politically Correct dogma that has become so common in present day literature dealing with frontier history (of course, Davis lived at a time when Political Correctness didn't exist, so naturally his book wouldn't contain any!)
A book like this easily destroys the sky-pie nonsense found in sob-story exercises such as Dee Brown's "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee" and blatantly absurd and Politically Correct motion pictures like "Dances With Wolves" and "Geronimo, An American Legend". In fact, its a very nice counter weight to the drivel out there that seeks to leave unaware people with the impression that the American Indian was some sort of Red Aristocrat or Feathered Philosopher/Sage who was unfairly victimized by unreasonable invaders.
However, I have even better works to offer you if you are sincerely interested in FACT and Truth concerning the White/Indian conflicts. These are all available right here at amazon.com, and the titles to look for are; THREE YEARS AMONG THE COMANCHES ( a first-hand narrative by a Texas Ranger who was captured by Comanches and how he was brutally and sadistically treated, how he escaped, and how he evaded re-capture.) LIFE AMONG THE APACHES ( a first-hand narrative by John Cremony of the famed California Volunteers, who dealt with Apache, Comanche, Kaddo and other hostiles at a time BEFORE the United States Army had even a small force in the southwestern region of North America.) and lastly, SCALP DANCE ( a book consisting of detailed military and civilian/settler accounts of the chilling, blood-curdling wars with Southern Cheyenne, Comanche, Arapaho, Sioux, and Kiowa on the high plains). These three books will serve to provide you with an excellent AND HISTORICALLY ACCURATE overview of frontier history, and an antidote to all the Politically Correct dogma out there that is being passed off as "fact" by glib leftist "educators", self-proclaimed "experts" and psuedo-historians. Read them all, none are dry or boring, and all are of the "couldn't put it down" type of literature.
After you've finished THREE YEARS AMONG THE COMANCHES, LIFE AMONG THE APACHES, and SCALP DANCE, get "Indian Wars" by Robert Utley. By reading these books in this order, you'll grasp the gravity of the incidents that Utley superbly, but only generally deals with, and you'll not only appreciate Utley's work even more, you'll also appreciate the fine line a genuine historian like Utley has to walk while trying to make a living within the Politically Correct jungle that surrounds the academic slums of so-called "modern education".
and another by Lynda "OAD CAM"
In 99.9% of all books written by whitemen about American Indians it is hard to find even a grain of truth or fact. This book is the exception that proves the rule! While nothing is glossed over, the author does not attempt to sway the reader with sensationalism. He tells about his experiences and gives the good with the bad. He exhibits an almost unheard of ability to set aside any preconceived notions and actually see clearly both sides of the conflict AND views the American Indian as a human being, not some sort of subspecies. An exceptional view of reality that should be required reading in all American history classes from junior high/middle school through the college level.)
Lt Davis & Apache Scout Vignette - PEACHES The Reluctant Warrior

Kosto Barry Granlundof's commentary on the movie concludes this vignette:
"POLITICALLY CORRECT NONSENSE: Once again, Hollywood takes a series of incidents in frontier history AND several people who were involved in these incidents, and reduces them to a mess that can accurately be described as one ounce of fact diluted in a gallon of hogwash! They couldn't even film this trash in the correct locations! Instead of southeastern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico and choice locations in Mexico, they do the filming in UTAH! As for the movie's content, well, there's a list of falsehoods a mile long I could mention, but if you're really interested in finding out just how absurd this movie is, read Geronimo's autobiography and see for yourself....And I really don't care about the performances of Duval or Hackman or anyone else in this "production" either. What I can't stand is the Politically Correct slant it was given AND the blatant distortion of history that Hollywood once again trys to "educate" the mindless movie goers with. I am so sick and tired of this sort of movie - the "Dunces With Wolves" variety of PC rubbish - that I just had to write this review. Now, for those who want more than Hollywood's "entertaining" version of the past frontier, I recommend reading SCALP DANCE and THREE YEARS AMONG THE COMANCHES and LIFE AMONG THE APACHES and of course, things like GERONIMO,by S.M.Barrett Read all these and then re-watch this movie and DUNCES WITH WOLVES and you'll see exactly what I mean in this review.

-----------------------
Emmet Crawford was in overall charge of Apache scouts after General George Crooks's return to the Department of Arizona in 1882...born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, September 6, 1844. He had enlisted in the California Volunteers at the outbreak of the Civil War and had risen to the rank of First Lieutenant of Volunteers. At the end of the was, deciding to make the army his career, he accepted a commission as a Second Lieutenant when the war ended. In December 1870, by then a First Lieutenant in the 3rd Cavalry, he had come to Arizona. Early in 1872 his regiment had been transferred north to fight the Sioux, and a decade passed before he returned to the desert Southwest. By then he was a Captain and was detached from his regiment as military commandant at San Carlos. He led his scouts into Sonora in 1883 and aided in forcing Chiricahuas back to reservation. At San Carlos he concentrated on teaching his charges how to farm, and in the process they learned to trust him. Britton Davis, a lieutenant serving under Crawford, later wrote of him: "Crawford was born a thousand years too late. Mentally, morally and physically he would have been an ideal knight of King Arthur's Court. Six feet one, gray eyed, untiring, he was an ideal cavalryman and devoted to his troop, as were the men of it devoted to him. He had a keen sense of humor but something had saddened his early life and I never knew him to laugh aloud. Modest, self-effacing, kindly, he delighted in assigning to his subordinates opportunities and credit he might well have taken to himself - a very rare trait in an officer of any army. His expressed wish was that he might die in the act of saving the lives of others." - http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/ecrawford.htm
Charles Bare Gatewood First Lieutenant, United States Army
-----------------------------
Captain Emmet Crawford was killed in Mexico on January 18, 1886, after his command of Third U.S. Cavalry had chased Apache Indian raiders across the border and was attacked mistakenly by Mexican soldiers.

For northwest Nebraska residents Crawford's death brought back memories of his 1870s service at Fort Robinson. They named their new town, which had sprung up near the fort, in Crawford's honor.
Elsewhere Nebraskans expressed their sense of loss. Z. T. Crawford lived in Kearney, and his brother's body, hastily buried in Mexico, was exhumed and brought to Nebraska for burial. The Kearney New Era, April 17, 1886, detailed the elaborate ceremony and its Victorian setting:
"[T]he funeral service . . . was one of the largest and most imposing held in the State. . . . Model Opera house was draped in a becoming manner. Crape [crepe], flags and evergreens formed the drapings. . . . At the back of the hall was placed a large catafalque [a wooden framework], draped with black and white nun's veiling, upon which was perched a large gray eagle, draped stars and stripes. At the front and in the center of the catafalque was placed a large photograph of Captain Crawford. . . .
"The casket was of bronze and a facsimile of the one in which President Garfield was entombed. The floral decorations covering the casket were well arranged. . . , while the pillow presented by the same company [of the Colorado National Guard] and composed chiefly of Calla Lilies, Marchiel Niel roses, maiden fern and Artillery plant, was one of the most beautiful floral decorations of its kind ever seen in this portion of the state."
In 1908 Crawford's body was reburied in Arlington National Cemetery. A five-foot obelisk of white marble marks his resting place. - http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/timeline/crawford_emmet.htm
----------- Shortly after Crawford's murder, the U.S. government officially protested to Mexican officials, who in turn ordered the state of Chihuahua to investigate the incident. On February 11, 1886, a district judge in Chihuahua City opened hearings on "the armed collision that took place between an American force of Indian auxiliaries and a Volunteer force from Guerrero." By May of that year more than thirty individuals had testified. Finally, in February 1887, the Mexican government offered to return the mules and equipment which Lieutenant Maus (Medal of Honor) had been forced to give the nacionales. No apology was forthcoming. Gen Crook paid the most fitting tribute to Crawford. He maintained that, had Crawford lived, the renegades would all have surrendered in January of 1886, thereby saving almost eight more months of pursuit and death. - http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/ecrawford.htm Captain Emmet Crawford Captain, United States Army
-----------------------------
FREDERICK ELISHA PHELPS: Born in Ohio, he graduated from the U.S. Military Academy in 1870. He was commissioned a second lieutenant and assigned to the 8th Cavalry. He was promoted to first lieutenant 1879, and served at Fort Davis with Company F of the 8th Cavalry from October 1887 to May 1888. He was promoted to captain in September 1889 and retired in 1891.
Description of hardship & privation of troopers on extended excursions:
"I had lost my blouse, the back of my blue shirt (the only one I had left) was missing, my long hair reached almost to my shoulder, my beard untrimmed for three months, fell on my breast, and I had on a soft wool hat, the crown of which was missing entirely and the brim had been town at various time to help kindle a fire..I trotted up to my quarters and found Mary (his wife) standing on the porch. I dismounted and said "hello, old lady." She looked me up and down and then, turning to the orderly...she cooly said, "Orderly, is that my husband?" The grinning orderly touched his cop and said "Yes, mam." "Take him down to the creek and wash him, " was her unexpected reply." - pp.206-21. - Reeve, Frank D., ed., "Frederick E. Phelps: A Soldier's Memoirs," New Mexico Historical Review, XXV. cited in Clendenen, Clarence C.: BLOOD ON THE BORDER - The United States Army and The Mexican Irregulars, 1969.

In describing "quarters," while "...at Fort Bayard in those years, Lt. Frederick E. Phelps, recorded the conditions which the men endured at the time. Phelps lived in a 10-foot by 12-foot room with a kitchen. He described it as: One wall was built of stones picked up on the adjacent hillside, one was of "Adobe" (sun dried brick), one of pine logs, set on end, and the fourth of slabs from a saw-mill. The floor was of rough boards, a foot wide; the ceiling of canvas, the roof of mud, the front door of two boards on wooden hinges with a wooden latch, one window with four panes of glass, the sash Immovable --this was the parlor (Phelps, Capt. FE, unpubl., pp. 1-2)
Other terms used by Phelps to describe the fort include "desolate, jumping off place, everything undesirable." He described the living quarters as huts of logs and round stones, with flat roofs that leaked in the summer and brought down rivulets of liquid mud, and in winter were the hiding place of the tarantula and the centipede.
An 1872 report showed some improvement in living conditions for the 300 men stationed there. Quarters for the officers and men continued to be of hewn logs but with mud roofs. Houses for the quartermaster and commissary departments were built of adobe. The hospital was built of adobe and the guardhouse of stone. A corral 148 feet by 230 feet housed the post animals. The walls surrounding the fort were 6 feet high and built of adobe on a stone foundation." - http://www.zianet.com/whisperingcanyon/fort_bayard.html

-----------------------------
Vanished Arizona Recollections of the Army Life by a New England Woman by Martha Summerhayes
also at Recollections
John Wyer & Martha Summerhayes - Arlington National Cemetary

-----------------------------
FReeper Foxhole Remembers the Campaign to Capture Geronimo (Jul - Sep, 1886) - June, 13th, 2005

Assignment Geronimo

Apache Devil (1933) - Edgar Rice Burroughs
ARIZONA APACHE WARS
Utley - Frontiersmen in Blue
Utley - Frontier Regulars.htm
or see 7th Cav Vignettes

-----------------------------


Charles Erskine Scott Wood

Charles Erskine Scott Wood, 1852-1944 Charles Erskine Scott Wood was born in Erie, Pennsylvania on February 20, 1852 to William and Rose Mary Wood. He graduated from West Point Military Academy in 1874 and served as an army lieutenant. Wood fought in both the Nez Perce War in 1877 and the Bannock-Paiute War in 1878. It was in this capacity that he experienced the southeastern Oregon desert, described as a "lean and stricken land," that was to have a deep influence on him. While still in the military, he began contributing articles to periodicals. He also attended Columbia University and by 1883 he had collected a Ph.D. and a law degree.

The next year Wood left military service after he was admitted to the Oregon bar. He began a law practice in Portland that would span 35 years. Instrumental in founding the library and art museum, he became a leading figure in Portland's cultural scene. Meanwhile, he wrote both poetry and prose. His Poet in the Desert became a literary success soon after it was published in 1915. Ironically, while Wood was an avowed social anarchist, he served as attorney for one of eastern Oregon's biggest land monopolies. He argued a major land claim related to the old military wagon roads across Oregon and won a million dollar law fee.

Wood spent the last 25 years of his life with his second wife, poet Sara Bard Field, in the Los Gatos, California, retreat that they called "The Cats." Here he authored works that brought him national recognition. Among them was his satirical drama Heavenly Discourse, published in 1927, which soon became a bestseller.

Wood was a fascinating and polished personality, as at ease in a banker's drawing room as he was at a gathering of Wobblies. He drew friends from contrasting corners of society, including such well-known figures as Chief Joseph, Mark Twain, Emma Goldman, Ansel Adams, Robinson Jeffers, Clarence Darrow, Childe Hassam, Margaret Sanger, and John Steinbeck.

Wood died in Los Gatos, California on January 22, 1944.

Also see Wood's firsthand account The Pursuit and Capture of Chief Joseph documenting the 1877 retreat by Nez Perce Indians.
source - http://bluebook.state.or.us/notable/notwood.htm

Charles Erskine Scott Wood led an extraordinary life, long, varied, and vital. Soldier, port, attorney, satirist, philosophical anarchist, reformer, bon vivant, boon companion, painter, art patron, bibliophile, and pacifist--C.E.S. Wood was all of these. Approaching the Renaissance ideal of the universal man, he packed into nearly 92 years of living three distinct careers and a remarkable variety of experiences, exhibiting a rare capacity for savoring life and a stunning diversity of talent, including a protean, at times profound, facility for the literary arts.

An early impression derives from a large camera study of Lieutenant C.E. Scott Wood in his mid-twenties. he wears the uniform of an infantry man in the United States Army. He is seated on a rough-hewn chair, casting a level gaze at whatever crosses his line of vision, a revolver held loosely on his thigh. The youthful face is handsome-straight nose, resolute mouth, strong jaw.

In his later years, Colonel Wood (a militia title conferred by an Oregon governor years after Wood left the military) looked like an old testament prophet, with long snowy hair and full-flowing beard, but still the level gaze, the deep-set blue eyes. In a portrait by Ansel Adams, he looks far into the camera's eye, his face remarkably unwrinkled, except around the eyes where the lines seem etched by wisdom.

Between the handsome lieutenant and the snowy-haired sage lies almost a century of U.S. history, from the Wild West to the Second World War. Wood's life and writing chronicle and interpret many aspects of American life: westward expansion, the Progressive movement, women's fight for suffrage, isolationism and the Anti-imperialist League, The "Wobblies," Victorianism, Christian Socialists, the anarchist movement, Social Darwinism, and others that are faint in our cultural memory. Literature professor James Caldwell summed it up in a single phrase when he described his father-in-law as n "era and a realm." In the sparkle of Wood's exceptional character and vision lies a literature of some distinction, capable of grace, wit, delight, and righteous fire.

C.E.S. Wood lived intensely, often extravagantly, in terms of money, emotion, and engagement in the arts. He drew friends from contrasting corners of society: Mark Twain and Chief Joseph; anarchist Emma Goldman and James J. Hill, builder of the Great Northern Railroad; Robinson Jeffers, California poet, and Clarence Darrow, prominent defense lawyer; Bill Hanley, Harney County cattleman, and Childe Hassam, American impressionist painter; Margaret Sanger and Mark Van Doren; Corinne Roosevelt Robinson, Teddy roosevelt's sister, and Langston Hughes, Black Poet; John Reed and John Steinbeck--to name a few. Described by a contemporary as a man of "vitality, magnetism, charm, wit, and teasing irreverence, "Wood was a complex, contradictory, and unique man who forged a distinctive and refreshing lifestyle and projected, as well, a vision that illuminates the American West. His life and work can be seen as taking Jeffersonian values--that "all men are created equal...endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"--and passing them through the crucible of what the historian of the American West Frederick Jackson Turner called, "the ennobling experience...the fierce love of freedom...furnished to the pioneer."

There was a rugged dimension to Wood's character and vision, the result, no doubt, of his frontier experience and his years on the Pacific slope. He put it bluntly in 1902 at the Manhattan Club when he spoke to a large gathering of Eastern Democrats:

I come from the West where the illimitable mountains lift up their heads to the very silence of God. Where the vast wilderness sits in silent brooding on the truth. I come from the West, where in a civilization founded on the mine and the camp, we believe that the saloon and the theater has as good a right to be open on Sunday as the church and the school. I come from where we think that it is the right of every American to go to hell and be damned if he wants to. That is not humor--it is the truth.
The rangy defiance ringing in that statement, coupled with the conviction that freedom salted with knowledge will solve society's problems, ran through most of his life. In addition, Wood had an aesthetic side, a deep love of beauty and a sensuous appreciation of the good things in life--fine wines, pungent cheeses, exotic stones, and rare art objects. this, as well as his reading in classical literature, tempered his broad-shouldered western individualism, lending an urbane and learned flavor to his western verse and anarchist sallies.

The overall impression of Charles Erskine Scoot Wood is of an expansive and singular man of engaging personal growth, deeply and articulately responsive to both the world of nature and the injustice of the world, with a rare capacity for moving easily and without affectation between the sophisticated sphere of business, the professions, and high society, and the simpler circles of workers and artisans.

C.E.S. Wood was born February 20, 1852, in Erie, Pennsylvania, the second son of seven children (six boys and a girl) of Rosemary Carson and William Maxwell Wood, a navy surgeon, a Whig, and a friend of Zachary Taylor. Erskine, the name Wood preferred, remembered a stern father who imposed naval discipline upon his sons and a loving mother with deep violet eyes who insisted on strict observance of the Sabbath--no whistling, laughing, or "kicking down the leaves." Though descended from Ralph and Ebenezer Erskine, founders of the "New Kirk" movement, a religious rebellion in Scotland aimed at liberalizing church doctrine, Rose was deeply aware of her subordinate role in the Wood ménage.

Surgeon Wood was on active duty for much of his career. In 1846, speaking fluent Spanish, he traveled incognito across Mexico delivering to Commodore Robert Stockton long-awaited word of the outbreak of war between the United States and Mexico, news that facilitated the acquisition of California. A few years later, serving with the Asiatic Squadron, he was on hand at the opening of Japan. He wrote several popular books about his experiences. Surgeon Wood had a substantial library of Spanish, French, and English classics. Here Erskine first read Cervantes (one of his father's favorites), Voltaire, and Swift. In his autobiographical notes, Wood writes that his father's "taste for classical literature, his ideas upon culture and manhood, his contempt for wealth as an object of sole pursuit in life, had an influence on my own character." Wood's literary imagination was also clearly affected by the romantic tales of adventure and exotic objects his father brought home from his voyages.

With the close of the Civil War, William Maxwell Wood, now Surgeon General of the Navy in recognition of his service with the North Atlantic Blockading Squadron, took his family from Erie to Rosewood Glen, a small farm in the rolling hill country on the outskirts of Baltimore and within convenient reach of his office in Washington.

In his manuscript autobiography (begun in 1913 but never completed), much of which reads like passages from Mark Twain, Erskine sees himself as a mix of Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer with the Erie Canal serving as his Mississippi River. Erskine pictures his teen years on the Maryland farm in lyrical tones. The prevailing atmosphere in the Wood home was upper-middle-class conservative with order, duty, and propriety as cardinal virtues. But the beauty of the surroundings seems to have helped offset some of the harshness at home. A clear, swift-flowing stream threaded stands of oak, hickory, maple, and red gum hung with clusters of purple fox grapes. Spring brought trailing arbutus with its scatter of pink stars, and laurel, wild honeysuckle, and azaleas sweetened the woods. At Rosewood Glen, Erskine learned to ride horseback, swing the scythe and cradle, and to hunt possum and raccoon.

Erskine received his early education in private and public schools. In the fall of 1868, he enrolled as a day scholar in the St. Thomas School for Boys. He remembers most vividly the snuff-taking, cane-wielding "Old Murray" who taught English and Latin grammar, geography, history, and composition through a combination of intimidation and drill. Increasingly the teen-ager indulged his appetite for good reading in his father's library. He was also an avid reader of Mayne Reid's frontier stories and those, together with the sprawling pink expanse of the "Great American Desert" depicted in school geographies, set visions of the Wild West pulsing in his mind.

In the late spring of 1869, much to his surprise, Erskine's life took a dramatic turn. Surgeon Wood arranged an interview for his son with president U.S. Grant. Erskine remembers nothing of what transpired during his talk with the President except that Grant lit a new cigar from the glowing stump of an old one. Erskine marked this in his mind as a bad habit. The interview combined with his father's influence resulted in Erskine's appointment-at-large to the United States Military Academy.

There is nothing to suggest that C.E.Scott Wood, as he was invariably listed on the military rolls, coveted the career of a professional soldier. Except for top marks in military drawing and creditable performance in ethics and law, he was a mediocre student and his military record bordered on disgrace. Piling up demerits just short of dismissal, the young cadet spent most weekends walking off punishment tours. In four years he never held a cadet rank. Years later, in New York, Erskine wrote in his journal: "I never pass West Point without thinking of my cadet days...I hate the memory of it even now."

C.E. Scott Wood's class was unique in that it enrolled James Webster Smith of North Carolina, the first Black to enter the Academy. Erskine joined his classmates in consigning Smith to "Coventry," the silent treatment. That action drew a sharp reprimand from Erskine's father. Smith eventually was found deficient in natural and experimental philosophy and dismissed. Nearly forty years later, in 1912, Wood resigned from the Oregon Bar because it refused to admit a Black, one of many stands demonstrating Erskine's departure from his youthful conformity.

Cadet Wood resented what he considered to be undue emphasis on scientific and technical subjects in the West Point curriculum. Seeking relief, he did an unusual amount of extracurricular reading, checking out works by Shakespeare, Spenser, Milton, and Sir Walter Scott, among others. He also found stimulation in the Academy's social scene, such as it was. He was an enthusiastic and graceful dancer and he often "led the German," a popular dance of the day. He was very handsome, quite the charmer, and amid the hops, cotillions, and flirtations he met and fell in love with Nanny Moale Smith, a Washington belle, who lived with her stepfather, Dr. Nathan Lincoln, a prominent Washington physician.

Casting desperately about for a way out of West Point, Erskine wrote letters home full of plans to resign and offer his services to the Mexican or Egyptian army or to go to Florida to grow oranges or, most frequently, to turn to a writing career. In a typical letter written to his son the cadet's fourth year, William Maxwell Wood expressed his disapproval of Erskine's restlessness in flat, measured, elegant prose: "It is this unreasonable desire to escape from the present to an unknown and uncertain future, which has from the beginning been one of the causes of your demerits...my earnest and final advice to you is to abandon all feverish desire after change and address yourself with honest and unceasing vigilance to the labor, the claims and obligations of the present around you---and of the place and position to which yo are called." The elder Wood's counsel prevailed, for when the class of 1874 was graduated, reduced from an entering strength of sixty-seven to forty-four, C.E. Scott Wood stood academically squarely in the middle.

Along with other Academy graduates of indifferent record, Wood was assigned to infantry duty on the frontier in the Department of the Pacific. In his late autobiographical notes he remembers inaccurately: "I tried to change into Custer's cavalry but the Adjutant General refused and thus saved my life." Actually, correspondence in the Huntington Library's Wood collection shows he tried to trade with another new officer who had a cavalry assignment but met with refusal.

The young "shavetail" reported first to Fort Bidwell, an outpost in the northeast corner of California. En route to Fort Vancouver, Washington Territory, his permanent post, Lt. Wood marched with his company along the lonely stretches of southeastern Oregon. The journey through the Harney Desert worked a profound influence on the 23-year-old lieutenant. The world of his youth had been green and wooded, with water ever close at hand. Now Wood was learning a new conception of space and scale. The human figure was minuscule and much of the land lay stark and brooding all the way to the horizon. The line of march took the soldiers to the west of Steens Mountain, an extended ridge-like uplift, its upper reaches patched with perpetual snow, rising to nearly ten thousand feet, forming on the east a jagged escarpment with over a thousand feet of free fall. The high desert is gray with sagebrush, greasewood, and rabbit brush, mottled with tough, twisted juniper and mountain mahogany, broken and uplifted by ramparts of rimrock. There are alkali flats that glare under the sun or float like puddles of pewter beneath the desert moon. Steens Mountain is more than a dramatic landmark, for snowmelt and springs cascading down glacier-cut gorges along its flanks produce marshland and meadow in the Harney Basin. Wherever there is water--along the narrow valley of the Donner and Blitzen River, for example--there are natural meadows of wild hay, rich browse for cattle and sheep and wild horses. When Lt. Wood and his companions were passing through, early settlers such as John Devine and Pete French were developing an impressive range cattle industry in the region.

As they approached "P" Ranch, home place of Pete French, the troops camped at the southern tip of a long marsh that stretched north of the Malheur and Harney lakes. Here tules, pondweed, cattails, reeds, and grasses of all kinds grew rank and high, providing perfect cover as well as food and nest material for more than two hundred species of waterfowl and wild birds. Lt. Wood rambled along the marsh's edge, wide-eyed at the teeming bird life on every side. The tules were hung with blackbirds, some of them red-epauletted, others with brilliant yellow heads. In a clearing were the matted sedge thinned out he counted more than thirty sandhill crane feeding quietly in the shallow water. The marsh fluttered with movement and rang with song--the sibilant notes of the blackbirds like air forced through a dusty flute, the muffled pile-driver boom of the bittern, the mewing cry of curlew and gull, the cacophony of countless ducks, the plaintive, monotonous shrill of killdeer and other sounds more or less musical but too muted or confused or unfamiliar for the young officer to sort out and identify. One species of wader caught Wood's fancy with its curved bill and its gleaming plumage of iridescent green and purple and bronze. He shot two of them, stretching the skins to dry in the sun, intending to send them to decorate the summer hats of Nanny Moale Smith, his sweetheart back east.

Years later, in his first effort at autobiography Erskine recalls with sensitive precision that night on the Harney Desert when he lay sleepless, feeling keenly "the isolation, the beauty, the solitude and hush and above all the vastness of the desert and the breathtaking sweep of the dark dome above with its busts of stars. "As the camp noises subsided, "a small owl, puffed up and mottled like a partridge, mounted a badger mound and stood solemn and still on legs long enough to seem borrowed. For some time the owl was mute and then it began its song, a tremulous, high, mellow coo-co-hoo, much like a dove but higher, fainter, incredibly soft."

The entire journey across the high desert of eastern Oregon affirmed the sense of freedom and expansiveness that the West had symbolized in Wood's boyhood. In a letter to Max Hayek, the translator of The Poet in the Desert, Erskine explains his love for eastern Oregon"

It means youth to me and the smell of sagebrush is the most delicious fragrance on earth: especially after a rain. Its blinding light, dazzling wide stretches--pale far purple mountain peaks--and the glorious skies are beautiful to my eyes--intoxicating beyond green mountains or sapphire sea.
Wood welcomed his new assignment. Vancouver was just across the Columbia River from Portland, a metropolis compared to Fort Bidwell. Yet Erskine did not forget the days and nights in the Harney Desert and he was drawn back to what he called, in The Poet in the Desert, "that lean and stricken land" many times until he knew its contours, its diversity, and its moods in intimate detail. In fact, the region was to run as a kind of theme through most of his life, and before he was done with the desert it would help turn him toward poetry, painting, and rebellion.

Stationed at Fort Vancouver, Wood grew restless. He had begun to keep a journal, a practice he would continue for much of his life. He also hoped to publish some of his writings back east. In the spring of 1877, he took a leave from his duties to escort a small expedition intent on climbing Mt. St. Elias. The party failed to reach the mountain but Wood collected stories and artifacts that would become the basis for an 1882 piece in Century Magazine called "Among the Thlinkits in Alaska." Noteworthy for its careful description and ethnographic detail, this article and A Book of Tales mark the beginning and ending of the first stage of Wood's writing career.

Lt. Wood had hoped to continue to explore Alaska, but in early June 1877 he was recalled to join his company that had taken the field in pursuit of Nez Perce Indians moving toward Canada to avoid confinement on the reservation at Lapwai, Idaho Territory. lt. Wood served creditably in this campaign, his baptism in fire, being one of only two white men to pursue the Nez Perce for the entire anabasis. As aide to general O.O. Howard, he was closely involved with the surrender negotiations on the morning of October 5th, gathering, through an interpreter, the gist of Joseph's sentiments regarding surrender. It is very likely that the young officer's literary bent moved him to shape the surrender speech, since become so famous, that he understood to have come from Joseph's lips. In fact, Lt. Wood's gift for phrasing goes far to explain the renown the speech has attained. The whole episode opened Wood's eyes to the power of the state to subdue a desperate and dignified people who were guilty simply of being in the way. Wood also bitterly resented Colonel Nelson Miles, who had entered the campaign only in its final stage, taking full credit for the Nez Perce surrender when it was Wood's commander, General O.O. Howard who had given chase to the Indians for nearly 2,000 miles. An indignant Wood released an account Pursuit to the Chicago papers that corrected the false impression, thereby arousing Miles's ire and setting up a tension between lieutenant and general that became a factor in Wood's resignation seven years later. At any rate, from the time of the surrender, Erskine and Joseph became friends and later, during his teens, Wood's eldest son, Erskine, spent parts of two summers in Joseph's camp at Nespelem, Washington.

In 1878, Wood served with Howard in the campaign against the Bannocks. In November, after the defeat of the Bannocks led by Chief Moses, Wood, now a first lieutenant, returned east to marry nanny Moale Smith, his sweetheart of cadet days. He brought her back with him to Fort Vancouver. In February on 1879, Wood served as Howard's emissary to Chief Moses, handling the peace negotiations. That fall the Wood's first son Erskine was born at Vancouver Barracks.

With the Pacific Northwest secure, General Howard was appointed superintendent of the United States Military Academy and Erskine returned with him to the scene of his unhappy cadet experiences, this time as adjutant. A second Child, Nan, who was to become Oregon's first congresswoman, was born at West Point in 1881.

When Mark Twain made several visits to West Point to talk to the cadets, Erskine, as his host, delighted Twain by making a secret printing on the Academy Press of Twain's "1601," or Conversation as it was by the Social Fireside in the Time of the Tudors, the humorist's racy, rough-and-tumble reconstruction of talk in the time of Queen Elizabeth. Participants, including Elizabeth, Sir Walter Raleigh, the Duchess of Bilgewater, Ben Jonson, and others, gathered in the Queen's private chambers, discuss such bawdy topics as who has broken wind. Adjutant Wood put together a small but sumptuous edition of the unsigned scatological piece on deckle-edged vellum, stained in mild coffee to suggest age and using old English-style type to give a touch of elegance to the four-letter words. The Academy printing of "1601" circulated among the military "brass" and one copy went to John Hay and another to the Bishop of London. For a time Wood and Twain exchanged letters and the latter's influence on much of Wood's writing is apparent, especially in his satire. This publishing adventure affirms Wood's rebel soul, his literary leanings, and his interest in fine press printing, something he would retain all his life.

By 1882, Wood was considering the law as an escape from the army. Citing earlier duty as judge advocate in the Department of the Columbia and arguing that formal training in law would approve his military efficiency, he secured a leave of absence to enroll in Columbia University, where he earned a B.S. and an LL.B. in 1883.

While in New York, Erskine formed what would become an abiding friendship with the painter J. Alden Weir, son of Wood's instructor in military drawing at West Point. Weir brought the lieutenant-on-leave into a small bohemian circle of artists and agents, including sculptor Olin Warner; A.W. Drake, art editor of Century; the impressionist painters Wyatt Eaton and Childe Hassam; and the eccentric and mystic, Albert Pinkham Ryder. Wood reveled in the company of this creative crew that gathered in a French restaurant on the south side of Washington Square or at a saloon on the corner of 14th and 4th to talk of European art trends or to deride the Hudson River School and denounce the sterility and inhibitions of the artistic establishment. Here, Erskine's penchant for rebellion took on another dimension.

In March 1883, law degree in hand, Lt. Wood was relieved of duty on Howard's staff and sent to Boise Barracks, Idaho Territory, to join his regiment. Nanny, with the two children Erskine and Nan and a third child, William Maxwell, about to arrive, were in Fort Vancouver. Erskine tried desperately for assignment to Vancouver. Extended military correspondence, in which Wood skirted insubordination, earned the insistent lieutenant what amounted to a reprimand from commanding General Miles; whereupon Erskine submitted a resignation that was promptly accepted, effective September 22, 1884. At 32, C.E.S. Wood turned to life in Portland and the practice of law. In 1884, Portland was a prosperous shipping town of over 20,000 population, known as the Boston of the West. Located in a temperate, green region west of the Cascade Range, the city lies along the shores of the Willamette River close to is juncture with the Columbia. To the west are the Coast Range and the Pacific Ocean about 100 miles away. The Willamette Valley spreads to the south.....

In a letter to Helena kay, author of a 1937 Master's thesis on his writing, he explains the development of his ideas concerning the economic and social order:

I saw that the trouble was we were living in a feudal system, and by the old feudal fee simple deed, we were giving to a few shrewd forerunners the people's heritage and creating a small group of feudal barons who owned all and who were willing the people should multiply to become fighters and industrial serfs. Even when as a young lieutenant I was campaigning against the wild men of the desert, the desert had got into my blood, [and] I saw this going in fee simple to cattle and sheep men, the water all seized, no place for hopeful settlement, and the great forests also stolen by the fee simple deed, a corrupt or ignorant congress, and some organized perjury. I saw everything of value taken usually by some form of fraud--water power, oil, iron, coal, copper--everything.

Wood's libertarian views were shaped in part from reading in Jefferson, Thoreau, Marx, the French Anarchist Proudhon, the Russian anarchist Kropotkin, and single-taxer Henry George. Wood subscribed to benjamin Tucker's Liberty, an organ of American anarchism that served, after the turn of the century, as an outlet for his increasing literary flow, playing an important part in his apprenticeship as a writer and a social thinker. Wood came to believe in the doctrine of right and beneficial use, the concept that land and water should be owned by those who use it productively, not by the grantees and their heirs and assigns, in perpetuity. Privilege and class distinctions violated Wood's sense of justice.

Erskine's broad philosophy of freedom that he called philosophical anarchism, the belief that the best way to assure one's own freedom was to insure the freedom of others, carried over into aspects of his personal life. There it involved their children, who were given the maximum amount of freedom consistent with their own safety. Barbara hartwell writes of them: "They were utterly uninhibited before anyone even heard the word; their personalities were allowed to ramble richly at will...." When he wa criticized for excessive permissiveness, Erskine responded: "Doubtless I made many mistakes, but I preferred to err on the side of minimum restraint, having been subjected to its maximum operation in my childhood."

The turn of the century marks a serious shift in Wood's life in Portland. His interest in the law waned and his urge to write intensified; his passion for his wife subsided into affection, and his philosophical anarchism cohered, strengthening his radical stance.

The most crucial aspect of Erskine's personal rebellion was his rejection of the institution of marriage. He saw monogamy as a kind of tyranny that stifled freedom. He could not accept the idea that two people sign a piece of paper that binds them together no matter how they change or what is in their hearts. In his own case, the marriage ties were not holding. Nanny's health was uncertain. She suffered from chronic headaches and in 1891 and for several years after she spent a great deal of time at a spa in Colorado Springs. Husband and wife grew apart, taking vacations alone and sleeping in separate rooms. Moreover, Erskine was a handsome, articulate, charming, and romantic figure. Beautiful women found him most attractive and he in turn was attracted to them. Sometime around the turn of the century, his secretary for the Lazard Freres account, Kitty Beck, a sensitive and appealing woman with radical sympathies, became his lover. The gap separating him from Nanny widened, although his affection for her remained strong...........

source - http://oregonstate.edu/dept/press/u-w/woodIntro.html


His law firm became the foremost firm in Oregon. As a lawyer he represented the railroad magnates in their various land fraud schemes but also represented suffragettes, political prisoners, labor organizers, the poor, artists, and the people of Oregon in the various actions which led ultimately to the referendum and intiative system, the direct primary and direct election of senators (they had previously been appointed by a corrupt legislature and the conviction of several of them, as well as a Senator and Oregon Congressman in land frauds, led to public revulsion). His involvement in the Oregon progressive causes born in the 19th century led to his investigation by the House Unamerican Activities Committee, an irony since he, far more than they, was a product of the nation's traditions.
He died in 1944, having lived to see both the opening of the Civil War (he witnessed the battle of the Monitor and the Merrimac) and WWII, as well as everything between.
He was the sweetheart of Sara Bard Field, a leading Oregon suffragette (Click here).
http://www.corvalliscommunitypages.com/Americas/US/Oregon/OregonNotCorvallis/woodall.htm

son Erskine:Erskine Wood
A friend's chance remark called to mind the elder Erskine Wood (1879-1983), born at Vancouver Barracks 125 years ago this month. Celebrated late in his life for his recollections of the 19th century (as a boy he spent a summer with Chief Joseph and the Nez Perce Indian Tribe), he gave his last public speech in the fall of 1982. He was one of several hundred persons in the audience at a speech given by the then-president of Harvard University, who recognized him as being the oldest living graduate (Class of 1901) and invited him to say a few words. Mrs. Wood wheeled him to the foot of the stage, and he stood and walked up the stairs to the lectern, where he said:
"You have just heard from the President of Harvard. When I was at Harvard the president was a man named Charles Eliot, who was famous for never speaking to an undergraduate. The Harvard Lampoon published a verse about President Eliot, which ran:
Prexy Eliot went walking in the SQUAAARE [Mr. Wood raised his voice for "Square"],
And stopped to speak to every student THEEEERE,
They had to pile the dead high in the AIIIIIIIR.
That was my president."
But recalling the past wasn't the only thing that Mr. Wood did; he also enjoyed a long career as a prominent admiralty lawyer in Portland, trying his last case when he was 99, and he kept an eye open for women until he died. One of his visiting nurses was a striking blonde in her mid-20s. A few weeks before he died, he said to her flirtatiously, "I should get up and chase you." She answered in same light tone, "Try it; maybe I wouldn't run away." He thought about it, shook his head, and replied, "Ah, Blondie, I couldn't do you justice."
the younger Erskine Wood had five wives (not simultaneously), all of whom survived him and all of whom were listed in his obituary.-http://isaac.blogs.com/isaac_laquedem/2004/09/erskine_wood.html


--------------------
William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill

In 1898 with the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor, demand for war against Spain swept the country. In New York, Col. Wm. F. Cody's Wild West Show featured a troup of Cuban rebels who unfurled the Cuban flag while the cowboy band played a Cuban anthem and the audience yelled "Cuba Libre." Col. Cody, himself, offered to raise an army of 30,000 American Indians. Thus, John Hay's "splendid little war" broke out with Spain. Almost immediately Theodore Roosevelt ordered a Brooks Brothers custom made uniform and organized a volunteer cavalry troop of which he was to be second in command. Leonard Wood was to be in command. The troop was composed mostly of cowboys but also included a few Indians and wealthy polo-playing easterners. In Arizona, a former sheriff of Yavapai County, William Owen "Buckey" O'Neill, under whom Horn had served as a deputy, organized a troop, later to be Troop "A" of the Rough Riders. Of O'Neill Roosevelt later wrote in his 1899 The Rough Riders:

There was Bucky O'Neill, of Arizona, Captain of Troop A, the Mayor of Prescott, a famous sheriff throughout the West for his feats of victorious warfare against the Apache, no less than against the white road-agents and man-killers. His father had fought in Meagher's Brigade in the Civil War; and he was himself a born soldier, a born leader of men. He was a wild, reckless fellow, soft spoken, and of dauntless courage and boundless ambition; he was stanchly loyal to his friends, and cared for his men in every way.

In July, shortly before Roosevelt's famous charge, O'Neill was killed at Kettle Hill. But O'Neill in some aspects was less than rough and tough. When Dennis Dilda, a condemned murderer, was hanged in 1886, O'Neill commanded the Honor Guard. When the trap dropped, O'Neill fainted dead away.

source - http://www.wyomingtalesandtrails.com/horn3.html

--------------------
William Nivison Blow, Major USV
4th Virginia Volunteer Infantry
Contributed by John Blow
Captain William Nivison Blow, USA was born August 11, 1855 at "Tower Hill", Sussex County, Virginia, and graduated from the Virginia Military Institute with high honors in 1876. For some years he devoted himself to the practiceof civil engineering.
In 1882 he married Mary Elizabeth Thomas, daughter of General H. G. Thomas. He was appointed second lieutenant of the 15th Infantry on October 20, 1884. He served with his regiment at Fort Randall Dakota till 1890 and Fort Sheridan Illinois until 1896. He acted as adjutant general of the troops engages in suppressing the riots in Chicago, Ill. in 1894. He was commended in General Orders No. 33 Headquarters of the Army, for courage and prompt energy in rescuing, at the peril of his life, a young man from drowning in Lake Michigan, near Fort Sheridan. He served for four years as adjutant quartermaster of the 15th Infantry.
He was serving at Fort Bayard, NM, when he was appointed in 1898 a major of the 4th Virginia Volunteer Infantry, with which he served in Cuba till Jan. 11 1900, when the regiment was mustered out. He was first lieutenant in the Regular Army at this time, and by a singular coincidence his father and grandfather had served in the 4th as first lieutenants. His first cousin, Lt. George Preston Blow, USN, was on board the MAINE when she was sunk in Havana harbor.
He was disbursing officer of the Cuban census until Feb. 1901. Blow was promoted Captain in 1899 and served with his company in the relief expedition in China in 1900 when he went with his regiment to the Philippines, serving there until 1902.
He returned to the U.S. in 1902 and was stationed at Monterey, California at the time of his retirement Nov. 25, 1905, for disability in the line of duty. He died October 28, 1907 at Sarah Leigh Hospital, Norfolk, Virginia., Oct. 28, 1907 following an operation for appendicitis.
Co D, 4th Virginia Volunteer Infantry, consisted of officers and men largely from Hampton, VA

--------------------
Pershing "John J. Pershing was born in rural Missouri in 1860 of what he described as "upstanding, though humble, European stock." His earliest memories were of the Civil War. Young Jack, son of a stalwart Unionist store owner, worshipped the bluecoats who rode through town, but he would probably never have joined their ranks if it had not been for the Panic of 1873, which wiped out his father's business. The only way Jack could afford to attend college was to win a position at West Point. His academic record at the Point was mediocre--he finished thirtieth out of a class of 71. But his soldierly bearing and leadership qualities were unsurpassed. He became first captain of the Corps of Cadets, the same post that Robert E. Lee held before him and that Douglas MacArthur would hold after him.
Upon graduation in 1886, 2nd Lieutenant Pershing was assigned to the 6th Cavalry at Fort Bayard, New Mexico. This provided him with a good introduction to the Old Army, 25,000 Indian-fighting, whisky-drinking, poker-playing, expletive-spewing men scattered in dusty outposts along the Western frontier. The officer ranks were still dominated by graying Civil War veterans. The era of the Old Army, designed for constabulary work in Indian territory, was drawing to a close. Young Pershing got to participate in its last campaigns, first against the Apaches and then against the Sioux Ghost Dancers in 1890.
In the next few years Pershing shuttled through a number of assignments, including a stint with the 10th Cavalry, a unit whose enlisted men were black, before winding up as an instructor at his alma mater. His martinet manner so grated on the cadets that they called him "Nigger Jack"--a nickname that stuck, though it was later softened to a more genteel "Black Jack." When the Spanish-American War broke out, Pershing wrangled an assignment back with the "Buffalo Soldiers" of the 10th Cavalry and helped storm San Juan Hill. A commanding officer said he was "cool as a bowl of cracked ice" under fire.
Afterward he was assigned to the Philippines, and it was here that Jack Pershing made a name for himself. He was sent to the island of Mindanao, populated by Muslim Moros who had never really been subdued by the Spanish. The Moros still practiced polygamy and slavery and fiercely defended their way of life, even unto death, with suicidal charges with razor-sharp weapons known as the kris and barong. Captain Pershing preferred to win over the Moros with outstretched hand rather than mailed fist. So successful was his campaign that he was made a datto, or chieftain. When he left the Philippines in 1903, suffering from malaria, he was already one of the most famous officers in the army.
Pershing was 45 years old, and though he had a reputation as a ladies' man and a fine dancer, he had never been married. In his next posting, Washington, he met an enchanting, if plain-looking, 25-year-old woman named Helen Frances Warren, who happened to be the daughter of Francis Warren, not only the richest man in Wyoming but also chairman of the Senate's Military Affairs Committee. Jack fell in love with "Frankie" at first sight. They were married in 1905 at a ceremony attended by Theodore Roosevelt, who pronounced it a "bully match."
The next year, Black Jack received a belated wedding present. President Roosevelt promoted him straight from captain to brigadier general over the heads of 862 more senior officers. Roosevelt explained that it was the only way he could reward merit; in those days all promotions short of general officer rank had to be done on strict seniority. But seeing the son-in-law of a powerful senator promoted out of turn caused no end of resentment in the officer corps. It even led to the publication of rumors, adamantly denied by Pershing, that he had fathered children out of wedlock with a Filipino woman while serving in the archipelago. His young bride stood by the newly minted general, and he survived the storm." - The Dusty Trail The Pancho Villa Punitive Expedition, 1916-1917. BY MAX BOOT - http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110001695

--------------------
THE WEST
WINNING THE WEST - THE ARMY IN THE INDIAN WARS, 1865-1890
West Point Graduates
Western Articles
Legends of America
Genealogy Images of History
--------------------
History Net Article Archives:
British History Archives

American History Archives

Military History Archives

Military History Quarterly Archives

America's Civil War

Civil War Times Archives

Wild West Archives

World War II Archives

Vietnam Archives



Continue to Soldier vignettes-2


Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com